Descriptor
| Multiple Choice Tests | 4 |
| Scoring Formulas | 4 |
| Tables (Data) | 4 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Guessing (Tests) | 2 |
| Test Interpretation | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Echternacht, Gary | 1 |
| Frary, Robert B. | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Hamdan, M. A. | 1 |
| Krutchkoff, R. G. | 1 |
| Traub, Ross E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHamdan, M. A.; Krutchkoff, R. G. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1975
The separation level of grades on a multiple-choice examination as a quantitative probabilistic criterion for correct classification of students by the examination was introduced by Krutchoff. (Author)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Knowledge Level, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedFrary, Robert B.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1977
To date a theoretical basis has not been developed for determining changes in reliability when score points from random guessing are eliminated and those from non-randon guessing are retained. This paper presents a derivation of an expression for the reliability coefficient which displays the effect of deleting score components due to random…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewedTraub, Ross E.; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Findings of this study suggest that it is preferable to attempt to control guessing through the use of the reward instruction rather than to attempt to control it using the penalty instruction or to encourage it using the insttruction to guess. (Authors/MB)
Descriptors: Grade 8, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests, Pacing
Echternacht, Gary – 1973
This study compares various item option scoring methods with respect to coefficient alpha and a concurrent validity coefficient. The scoring methods under consideration were: (1) formula scoring, (2) a priori scoring, (3) empirical scoring with an internal criterion, and (4) two modifications of formula scoring. The study indicates a clear…
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Performance Criteria


