Descriptor
| Multiple Choice Tests | 4 |
| Reliability | 4 |
| Scoring Formulas | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Guessing (Tests) | 2 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Credit Courses | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Chung, Jing-Mei | 1 |
| Cross, Lawrence H. | 1 |
| Essex, Diane L. | 1 |
| Kane, Michael T. | 1 |
| Moloney, James M. | 1 |
| Tollefson, Nona | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCross, Lawrence H.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1980
Use of choice-weighted scores as a basis for assigning grades in college courses was investigated. Reliability and validity indices offer little to recommend either type of choice-weighted scoring over number-right scoring. The potential for choice-weighted scoring to enhance the teaching/testing process is discussed. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Credit Courses, Grading, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedEssex, Diane L. – Journal of Medical Education, 1976
Two multiple-choice scoring schemes--a partial credit scheme and a dichotomous approach--were compared analyzing means, variances, and reliabilities on alternate measures and student reactions. Students preferred the partial-credit approach, which is recommended if rewarding for partial knowledge is an important concern. (Editor/JT)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Medical Students, Multiple Choice Tests, Reliability
Tollefson, Nona; Chung, Jing-Mei – 1986
Procedures for correcting for guessing and for assessing partial knowledge (correction-for-guessing, three-decision scoring, elimination/inclusion scoring, and confidence or probabilistic scoring) are discussed. Mean scores and internal consistency reliability estimates were compared across three administration and scoring procedures for…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students
PDF pending restorationKane, Michael T.; Moloney, James M. – 1976
The Answer-Until-Correct (AUC) procedure has been proposed in order to increase the reliability of multiple-choice items. A model for examinees' behavior when they must respond to each item until they answer it correctly is presented. An expression for the reliability of AUC items, as a function of the characteristics of the item and the scoring…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Item Analysis, Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests


