Descriptor
| Confidence Testing | 4 |
| Feedback | 4 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 4 |
| Time Factors (Learning) | 4 |
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 2 |
| Probability | 2 |
| Retention (Psychology) | 2 |
| Testing | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Bias | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWebb, James M.; And Others – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1994
Effects of immediate and delayed feedback on learning were studied in 2 experiments involving 120 undergraduate students. Subjects answered 90 general information multiple-choice items on 2 different occasions 1 week apart. Subjects rated their confidence in their responses. Results provide support for the Kulhavy and Stock model and the…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Feedback, Higher Education, Learning Processes
Peer reviewedSturges, Persis T. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978
Undergraduate students took a multiple choice, computer assisted test and received feedback (items with the correct answers identified) either: (1) immediately, item-by-item; (2) following the entire test; (3) 24 hours later; or (4) no feedback. Retention one to three weeks later was significantly better for delayed feedback, and confidence…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing, Confidence Testing, Feedback
Sturges, Persis T. – 1978
This experiment was designed to test the effect of immediate and delayed feedback on retention of learning in an educational situation. Four groups of college undergraduates took a multiple-choice computer-managed test. Three of these groups received informative feedback (the entire item with the correct answer identified) either: (1) immediately…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Confidence Testing, Educational Testing, Feedback
Shuford, Emir H., Jr.; Brown, Thomas A. – 1974
A student's choice of an answer to a test question is a coarse measure of his knowledge about the subject matter of the question. Much finer measurement might be achieved if the student were asked to estimate, for each possible answer, the probability that it is the correct one. Such a procedure could yield two classes of benefits: (a) students…
Descriptors: Bias, Computer Programs, Confidence Testing, Decision Making


