Descriptor
| Multiple Choice Tests | 5 |
| Test Format | 5 |
| Test Construction | 4 |
| Test Items | 4 |
| Classification | 2 |
| Objective Tests | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Downing, Steven M. | 5 |
| Haladyna, Thomas M. | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHaladyna, Thomas M.; Downing, Steven M. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1989
Results of 96 theoretical/empirical studies were reviewed to see if they support a taxonomy of 43 rules for writing multiple-choice test items. The taxonomy is the result of an analysis of 46 textbooks dealing with multiple-choice item writing. For nearly half of the rules, no research was found. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Literature Reviews, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewedHaladyna, Thomas M.; Downing, Steven M. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1989
A taxonomy of 43 rules for writing multiple-choice test items is presented, based on a consensus of 46 textbooks. These guidelines are presented as complete and authoritative, with solid consensus apparent for 33 of the rules. Four rules lack consensus, and 5 rules were cited fewer than 10 times. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Interrater Reliability, Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests
Peer reviewedDowning, Steven M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1992
Research on true-false (TF), multiple-choice, and alternate-choice (AC) tests is reviewed, discussing strengths, weaknesses, and the usefulness in classroom and large-scale testing of each. Recommendations are made for improving use of AC items to overcome some of the problems associated with TF items. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Research, Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests
Downing, Steven M. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2005
The purpose of this research was to study the effects of violations of standard multiple-choice item writing principles on test characteristics, student scores, and pass-fail outcomes. Four basic science examinations, administered to year-one and year-two medical students, were randomly selected for study. Test items were classified as either…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Medical Students, Test Items, Test Format
Haladyna, Thomas M.; Downing, Steven M. – 1988
The proposition that the optimal number of options in a multiple choice test item is three was examined. The concept of functional distractor, a plausible wrong answer that is negatively discriminating when total test performance is the criterion, is discussed. Three distinct groups of achievers (high, middle, and low) on a national standardized…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests, Physicians

Direct link
