Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Moral Development | 5 |
| Moral Issues | 5 |
| Age Differences | 3 |
| Elementary School Students | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Social Cognition | 2 |
| Adolescent Development | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Childhood Attitudes | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Child Development | 5 |
Author
| Gieling, Maike | 1 |
| Helwig, Charles C. | 1 |
| Kalle, Robert J. | 1 |
| Pressley, Michael | 1 |
| Suls, Jerry | 1 |
| Taylor, John H. | 1 |
| Thijs, Jochem | 1 |
| Verkuyten, Maykel | 1 |
| Walker, Lawrence J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Canada (Vancouver) | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkGieling, Maike; Thijs, Jochem; Verkuyten, Maykel – Child Development, 2010
Using social-cognitive domain theory and social identity theory, tolerance judgments of practices by Muslim actors among Dutch adolescents (12-17) were investigated. The findings for Study 1 (N = 180) demonstrated that participants evaluated 4 practices using different types of reasons: personal, social-conventional, and moral. In Study 2 (N =…
Descriptors: Muslims, Moral Issues, Cultural Pluralism, Public Support
Peer reviewedSuls, Jerry; Kalle, Robert J. – Child Development, 1978
Examined kindergarten, first, third, and fifth graders' reactions to the moral transgressions of children and adults. The stories presented to the children varied in terms of intention, damage, and age of transgressor. (BD)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Childhood Attitudes, Elementary School Students, Moral Development
Peer reviewedPressley, Michael; And Others – Child Development, 1980
College students who took the Defining Issues Test (DIT) were instructed to simulate the responses of 11-, 15-, and 19-year-old adolescents; other college students selected moral issues which they believed should be presented to adolescents in those age groups who were faced with the moral dilemmas in the DIT. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Adolescent Development, Age Differences, College Students, Ethical Instruction
Peer reviewedHelwig, Charles C.; And Others – Child Development, 1990
Moral judgments are an important aspect of social reasoning, not arbitrary products of social formations. Maintains that Gabennesch relegates moral concepts to reification, failing to account for the distinctions between conventionality and moral concepts. (BC)
Descriptors: Children, Ethics, Ethnocentrism, Moral Development
Peer reviewedWalker, Lawrence J.; Taylor, John H. – Child Development, 1991
Examined parents' role in the development of their children's moral reasoning. Differences in interaction style in discussions of hypothetical and of real-life dilemmas were found. Children's moral development was best predicted by a parental discussion style involving supportive interactions and the presentation of higher level moral reasoning.…
Descriptors: Discussion, Elementary School Students, Elementary Secondary Education, Foreign Countries
