NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Man, Kaiwen; Harring, Jeffery R.; Ouyang, Yunbo; Thomas, Sarah L. – International Journal of Testing, 2018
Many important high-stakes decisions--college admission, academic performance evaluation, and even job promotion--depend on accurate and reliable scores from valid large-scale assessments. However, examinees sometimes cheat by copying answers from other test-takers or practicing with test items ahead of time, which can undermine the effectiveness…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, High Stakes Tests, Test Wiseness, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maeda, Hotaka; Zhang, Bo – International Journal of Testing, 2017
The omega (?) statistic is reputed to be one of the best indices for detecting answer copying on multiple choice tests, but its performance relies on the accurate estimation of copier ability, which is challenging because responses from the copiers may have been contaminated. We propose an algorithm that aims to identify and delete the suspected…
Descriptors: Cheating, Test Items, Mathematics, Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Rinn, Anne N.; Boazman, Janette – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2014
The purposes of the current study were to evaluate a measure of academic dishonesty and examine high ability college students' loci of control and its effect on behaviors of academic dishonesty, as moderated by academic self-concept. A total of 357 high ability college students enrolled at two universities in the southwestern United States took…
Descriptors: Locus of Control, Self Concept, Academic Ability, Cheating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Belov, Dmitry I.; Armstrong, Ronald D. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
This article presents a new method to detect copying on a standardized multiple-choice exam. The method combines two statistical approaches in successive stages. The first stage uses Kullback-Leibler divergence to identify examinees, called subjects, who have demonstrated inconsistent performance during an exam. For each subject the second stage…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Cheating, Statistical Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Belov, Dmitry I. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
This article presents the Variable Match Index (VM-Index), a new statistic for detecting answer copying. The power of the VM-Index relies on two-dimensional conditioning as well as the structure of the test. The asymptotic distribution of the VM-Index is analyzed by reduction to Poisson trials. A computational study comparing the VM-Index with the…
Descriptors: Cheating, Journal Articles, Computation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fox, Jean-Paul – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2005
The randomized response (RR) technique is often used to obtain answers on sensitive questions. A new method is developed to measure latent variables using the RR technique because direct questioning leads to biased results. Within the RR technique is the probability of the true response modeled by an item response theory (IRT) model. The RR…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Probability, Markov Processes