Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 28 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 115 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 306 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 992 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Borich, Gary D. | 7 |
| Easom, Kenneth C. | 7 |
| Bhola, H. S. | 6 |
| Kim, Jin Eun | 6 |
| Mikulecky, Larry | 6 |
| Stufflebeam, Daniel L. | 6 |
| Alvir, Howard P. | 5 |
| Ayers, Jerry B. | 5 |
| Kohler, Paula D. | 5 |
| Paulsell, Diane | 5 |
| Quint, Janet | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 343 |
| Administrators | 124 |
| Researchers | 94 |
| Teachers | 88 |
| Policymakers | 76 |
| Community | 13 |
| Counselors | 13 |
| Students | 10 |
| Media Staff | 8 |
| Parents | 7 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 90 |
| Australia | 78 |
| California | 77 |
| Texas | 61 |
| Florida | 48 |
| Illinois | 48 |
| United Kingdom | 47 |
| New York | 44 |
| North Carolina | 44 |
| United States | 43 |
| Massachusetts | 31 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 5 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 9 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedLittle, Michael W.; Landis, Larry M. – Journal of Cooperative Education, 1984
Suggests a model for program evaluation that may be useful to cooperative education professionals in the field and to college and university officials as they seek to advance the implementation of cooperative education while remaining faithful to the curricular mission of the institution. (JOW)
Descriptors: Cooperative Education, Cost Effectiveness, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewedWang, Margaret C.; Walbert, Herbert J. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
This paper presents a case for the use of causal models derived from a substantive knowledge base of theory and research in the evaluation of educational programs. An evaluation of the Adaptive Learning Environments Model (ALEM) illustrates the causal-modeling approach to program evaluation. (BW)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews, Models
Burnham, Byron R. – 1999
Cluster evaluations have been defined as involving multiple sites, focusing on longer term projects, involving substantially different approaches to similar problems, and improving the social condition. Cluster evaluation is illustrated through the description of an initiative funded by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation called the Leadership for…
Descriptors: Cluster Grouping, Evaluation Methods, Groups, Leadership
Neufeld, Herm; Hinds, Ruby – Thrust for Education Leadership, 1974
The model which follows was developed for use in monitoring and reviewing compensatory education programs in the Santa Clara School District. (Author)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Diagrams, Humanization, Learning Processes
Bee, Clifford P. – Educational Technology, 1973
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines
Peer reviewedTrump, J. Lloyd – NASSP Bulletin, 1973
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational Problems, Models, Organizational Climate
Peer reviewedBalthazar, Earl E. – Mental Retardation, 1972
Described is a study providing paradigms for the development and evaluation of residential programs in storing relevant information, and in data processing. (Author)
Descriptors: Emotional Disturbances, Mental Retardation, Models, Program Development
Peer reviewedRoss, Colvin; Swick, Kevin – Integrated Education, 1971
Descriptors: Models, Program Descriptions, Program Evaluation, Teacher Education
Everly, Jack C. – Educational Technology, 1971
Descriptors: Adult Education, Educational Television, Evaluation Needs, Models
Peer reviewedGable, Robert K. – Journal of Special Education Technology, 1982
A model for evaluating special education programs is presented and applied to a microcomputer management and instruction program. The five stages of the model are developing the evaluation model, collecting the evaluation information, analyzing the data, writing and presenting the report, and applying the evaluation findings. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Management Information Systems, Microcomputers
Peer reviewedSatin, David George; Saxe, Leonard – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1979
Three models of evaluation emerge: objective and independent, objective but serving one interest, and pseudo-scientific public relations. Evaluation of an interdisciplinary mental health education program and roles must all be attended to or the weak link undermines the rest. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Interdisciplinary Approach, Mental Health Programs, Models
Hawes, Jon M.; And Others – Training and Development Journal, 1982
Sales training programs require continual evaluation. The authors present a conceptual model of the interrelationships of planning, training, evaluation, and modification (IPTEM) in corporate sales training programs. (CT)
Descriptors: Industrial Training, Models, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedCawley, Richard – Journal of the Community Development Society, 1981
The research described in this article was undertaken to discover the extent to which the SHAred Process Evaluation System (SHAPES) model of the community development process can be said to describe what actually happens in a community development project. The model and its development and instrumentation are described. (Author)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Community Development, Data Analysis, Models
Peer reviewedFuller, Bruce – Evaluation Review, 1981
Five causal metaphors running throughout youth employment and education programs are reviewed: (1) the functionalist economic model; (2) the institutional socialization model; (3) a psychosocial view of youth development; (4) the subcultural model; and (5) a self-determined community development vision. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedSarapin, Marvin I. – Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1981
Reviews formative evaluation and presents a model for instructional material development and revision. The model can be used for curriculum development efforts and is designed to be helpful in a variety of instructional efforts. (CT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Instructional Materials, Material Development


