Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Behavioral Science Research | 3 |
| Models | 3 |
| Statistics | 3 |
| Analysis of Covariance | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Critchfield, Thomas S. | 1 |
| Myung, Jay I. | 1 |
| Pitt, Mark A. | 1 |
| Porter, Andrew C. | 1 |
| Raudenbush, Stephen W. | 1 |
| Stilling, Stephanie T. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
The Matching Relation and Situation-Specific Bias Modulation in Professional Football Play Selection
Stilling, Stephanie T.; Critchfield, Thomas S. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2010
The utility of a quantitative model depends on the extent to which its fitted parameters vary systematically with environmental events of interest. Professional football statistics were analyzed to determine whether play selection (passing versus rushing plays) could be accounted for with the generalized matching equation, and in particular…
Descriptors: Play, Team Sports, Probability, Bias
Myung, Jay I.; Pitt, Mark A. – Psychological Review, 2009
Models of a psychological process can be difficult to discriminate experimentally because it is not easy to determine the values of the critical design variables (e.g., presentation schedule, stimulus structure) that will be most informative in differentiating them. Recent developments in sampling-based search methods in statistics make it…
Descriptors: Research Design, Cognitive Psychology, Information Retrieval, Classification
Peer reviewedPorter, Andrew C.; Raudenbush, Stephen W. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1987
Discusses analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), a standard tool for data analysis in psychological research. Considers the two major ways in which psychologists have used the technique: for increasing the precision of estimation in randomized experiments and for seeking to remove bias in nonrandomized studies, comparing ANCOVA with analytic…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Behavioral Science Research, Data Analysis, Estimation (Mathematics)

Direct link
