NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daoxuan Fu; Chunying Qin; Zhaosheng Luo; Yujun Li; Xiaofeng Yu; Ziyu Ye – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2025
One of the central components of cognitive diagnostic assessment is the Q-matrix, which is an essential loading indicator matrix and is typically constructed by subject matter experts. Nonetheless, to a large extent, the construction of Q-matrix remains a subjective process and might lead to misspecifications. Many researchers have recognized the…
Descriptors: Q Methodology, Matrices, Diagnostic Tests, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Youn Seon Lim – Applied Measurement in Education, 2024
Educational testing has been criticized for its disconnect from modern cognitive science and its limited role in improving instruction and student learning. Reform efforts emphasize the need for testing to provide specific diagnostic insights into students' skills and knowledge. Cognitive diagnosis (CD), an emerging paradigm in educational…
Descriptors: Q Methodology, Matrices, Models, Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kalkan, Ömür Kaya; Toprak, Emre – International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2022
All cognitive diagnostic models that evaluate educational test data require a Q-matrix that combines every item in a test with the required cognitive skills for each item to be answered correctly. Generally, the Q-matrix is constructed by education experts' judgment, leading to some uncertainty in its elements. Various statistical methods are…
Descriptors: Q Methodology, Matrices, Input Output Analysis, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sünbül, Seçil Ömür; Asire, Semih – International Journal of Progressive Education, 2018
In this study it was aimed to evaluate the effects of various factors such as sample sizes, percentage of misfit items in the test and item quality (item discrimination) on item and model fit in case of misspecification of Q matrix. Data were generated in accordance with DINA model. Q matrix was specified for 4 attributes and 15 items. While data…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Cognitive Ability, Problem Solving, Models
Gongjun Xu; Zhuoran Shang – Grantee Submission, 2018
This article focuses on a family of restricted latent structure models with wide applications in psychological and educational assessment, where the model parameters are restricted via a latent structure matrix to reflect prespecified assumptions on the latent attributes. Such a latent matrix is often provided by experts and assumed to be correct…
Descriptors: Psychological Evaluation, Educational Assessment, Item Response Theory, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Xu, Peng; Desmarais, Michel C. – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2016
In recent years, substantial improvements were obtained in the effectiveness of data driven algorithms to validate the mapping of items to skills, or the Q-matrix. In the current study we use ensemble algorithms on top of existing Q-matrix refinement algorithms to improve their performance. We combine the boosting technique with a decision tree.…
Descriptors: Matrices, Q Methodology, Psychometrics, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Hartz, Sarah; Roussos, Louis – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
This paper presents the development of the fusion model skills diagnosis system (fusion model system), which can help integrate standardized testing into the learning process with both skills-level examinee parameters for modeling examinee skill mastery and skills-level item parameters, giving information about the diagnostic power of the test.…
Descriptors: Skill Development, Educational Diagnosis, Theory Practice Relationship, Standardized Tests