Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Knowledge Representation | 5 |
| Misconceptions | 5 |
| Models | 5 |
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Concept Formation | 2 |
| Conflict | 2 |
| Learning | 2 |
| Prior Learning | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Algorithms | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Computers in Human Behavior | 1 |
| Educational Psychology Review | 1 |
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
| Journal of Research in… | 1 |
| Science and Education | 1 |
Author
| Butterfuss, Reese | 2 |
| Kendeou, Panayiota | 2 |
| Koumaras, Panagiotis | 1 |
| Mioduser, David | 1 |
| Noh, Taehee | 1 |
| Scharmann, Lawrence C. | 1 |
| Seroglou, Fanny | 1 |
| Tselfes, Vassilis | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Butterfuss, Reese; Kendeou, Panayiota – Educational Psychology Review, 2021
The aim of this paper is two-fold. The first aim is to review the core representational and processing aspects of influential accounts of single-document and multiple-document comprehension with a particular emphasis on how readers negotiate conflicting information during reading. This review provides the groundwork for the second aim--to expand…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Cognitive Processes, Conflict, Misconceptions
Butterfuss, Reese; Kendeou, Panayiota – Grantee Submission, 2021
The aim of this paper is two-fold. The first aim is to review the core representational and processing aspects of influential accounts of single-document and multiple-document comprehension with a particular emphasis on how readers negotiate conflicting information during reading. This review provides the groundwork for the second aim--to expand…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Cognitive Processes, Conflict, Misconceptions
Peer reviewedMioduser, David; And Others – Computers in Human Behavior, 1996
Presents a framework characterizing cognitive models generated by sixth-grade students for simple opening/closing control mechanisms, like the elevator door. The students' conceptions, missing conceptions, and misconceptions are analyzed at three levels: device knowledge; perception of the control process; and perceptions of information flow. (LAM)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Concept Formation, Grade 6, Information Transfer
Peer reviewedSeroglou, Fanny; Koumaras, Panagiotis; Tselfes, Vassilis – Science and Education, 1998
Addresses two research questions pertaining to the search for students' potential alternate conceptions within the history of science and the possibility of helping students overcome these misconceptions through historical experiments. Contains 19 references. (DDR)
Descriptors: Educational History, Electricity, Higher Education, Knowledge Representation
Peer reviewedNoh, Taehee; Scharmann, Lawrence C. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1997
Describes a study that explores the instructional influence of presenting pictures at the molecular level when introducing chemistry concepts and solving chemistry problems. Explores the effect of the pictures on students' conceptions and problem-solving abilities. Contains 59 references. (DDR)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Analysis of Covariance, Chemistry, Cognitive Structures

Direct link
