Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Methods | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Multidimensional Scaling | 2 |
| Cutting Scores | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Maps | 1 |
| Misconceptions | 1 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 1 |
| Stimuli | 1 |
| Training Methods | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkKingston, Neal M.; Tiemann, Gail C.; Loughran, Jessica T. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2013
The authors of this article comment on "Construct Maps as a Foundation for Standard Setting," by Adam E. Wyse (this issue) in which Wyse presents construct maps, a visual display of a variety of sources of evidence that support standard-setting decisions, and shows how this approach could be used with a variety of existing…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Maps, Methods, Misconceptions
Peer reviewedClayton, Michael C.; Hayes, Linda J. – Psychological Record, 2004
Throughout the 25-year history of research on stimulus equivalence, one feature of the training procedure has remained constant, namely, the requirement of operant responding during the training procedures. The present investigation compared the traditional match-to-sample (MTS) training with a more recent respondent-type (ReT) procedure. Another…
Descriptors: Training Methods, Models, Methods, Multidimensional Scaling
