Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Skill Analysis | 2 |
| Ability Identification | 1 |
| Basic Skills | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Fidelity | 1 |
| Instructional Design | 1 |
| Intellectual Development | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Airasian, Peter W. | 1 |
| Bart, William M. | 1 |
| Daly, Edward J., III | 1 |
| Ihlo, Tanya | 1 |
| Kupzyk, Sara | 1 |
| Young, Nicholas D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkKupzyk, Sara; Daly, Edward J., III; Ihlo, Tanya; Young, Nicholas D. – Psychology in the Schools, 2012
Response to Intervention provides a continuum of instruction across intensity levels through multitiered intervention models. A lot of work to date has been devoted to how to configure tiers to ensure the appropriate increases in intensity. Much less work has been devoted to making adjustments "within" tiers to attempt to forestall the need for…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Response to Intervention, Program Implementation, Fidelity
Peer reviewedAirasian, Peter W.; Bart, William M. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Validation studies of learning hierarchies usually examine whether task relationships posited a priori are confirmed by student learning data. This method was compared with a non-posited task relationship where all possible task relationships were generated and investigated. A learning hierarchy in a seventh grade mathematics study reported by…
Descriptors: Difficulty Level, Intellectual Development, Junior High Schools, Learning Theories
