Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Candoli, Carl | 1 |
| Chelimsky, Eleanor | 1 |
| Mark, Melvin M. | 1 |
| Rog, Debra J. | 1 |
| Scheerens, Jaap | 1 |
| van den Berg, Gerald | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mark, Melvin M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
Premised on the idea that evaluators should be familiar with a range of approaches to program modifications, I review several existing approaches and then describe another, less well-recognized option. In this newer option, evaluators work with others to identify potentially needed adaptations for select program aspects "in advance." In…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Methods, Models
Rog, Debra J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
This article illustrates the synergistic role between practice and theory in evaluation. Using reflective practice, the author reviews her own work as well as the work of other evaluators to illustrate how theory can influence practice and, in turn, how evaluation practice can inform and grow theory, especially evaluation theory. The following…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Evaluation Problems, Program Evaluation, Social Science Research
Peer reviewedScheerens, Jaap – International Journal of Educational Research, 1987
The value and limitations of conceptualizing evaluation as a decision-oriented research and appraisal activity is discussed. The decisional contexts of evaluation projects is examined in terms of a comparison between two models of organization decision making. Certain remedies for problems arising from attempts to enhance decisional relevance of…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedCandoli, Carl; And Others – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1995
This article identifies 12 commonly used models for evaluating superintendents and analyzes them through questions related to the "Personnel Evaluation Standards" of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. Models are grouped into those based on global judgment, judgment based on specific criteria, or data-driven…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Alternative Assessment, Criteria, Decision Making
Chelimsky, Eleanor – 1986
The politics of program evaluation are discussed from the personal perspective of the Director of the General Accounting Office's Program Evaluation and Methodology Division, which has produced reports for committees of the United States Congress. It is concluded that successful evaluations must be useful to others and must understand the…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
van den Berg, Gerald; And Others – 1986
This paper examines possible explanations for the fact that evaluation results are rarely used. Most explanatory factors for use of results in decision making mentioned in the literature have been clustered in three categories of variables. They concern: (1) the making of decisions about the practical problem; (2) the way in which evaluation is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Decision Making

Direct link
