Descriptor
| Models | 2 |
| Athletes | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Responses | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
Source
| Structural Equation Modeling | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMarsh, Herbert W.; Jackson, Susan A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1999
Studied the construct validity of state and trait-flow responses and demonstrated confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models useful for this study with a sample of 385 athletes. There was good support for the construct validity of Flow State Scale (S. Jackson and H. Marsh, 1996) responses, and the CFA approach appears useful. (SLD)
Descriptors: Athletes, Construct Validity, Models, Responses
Moustaki, Irini; Joreskog, Karl G.; Mavridis, Dimitris – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
We consider a general type of model for analyzing ordinal variables with covariate effects and 2 approaches for analyzing data for such models, the item response theory (IRT) approach and the PRELIS-LISREL (PLA) approach. We compare these 2 approaches on the basis of 2 examples, 1 involving only covariate effects directly on the ordinal variables…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Comparative Analysis, Factor Analysis

Direct link
