Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Data Collection | 4 |
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Models | 4 |
| Data Analysis | 3 |
| College Faculty | 2 |
| Surveys | 2 |
| Academic Rank (Professional) | 1 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Citizenship | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research in Higher Education | 4 |
Author
| Bell, Alli | 1 |
| Ervin, Delbert | 1 |
| Hackman, Judith Dozier | 1 |
| Lawrence, Janet | 1 |
| Ott, Molly | 1 |
| Silverman, Robert J. | 1 |
| Zey-Ferrell, Mary | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lawrence, Janet; Ott, Molly; Bell, Alli – Research in Higher Education, 2012
Building on a theoretical framework that links characteristics of individuals and their work settings to organizational commitment (OC) and citizenship behavior, this study considers why faculty may be disengaging from institutional service. Analyses of survey data collected from a state system of higher education suggest that job characteristics,…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Socialization, Citizenship, College Faculty
Peer reviewedSilverman, Robert J. – Research in Higher Education, 1985
Citation data for higher education journal articles published in the core literature from 1975 to 1981 are presented. Reference use trends are examined over the period covered by the research and by the role and institutional location of authors. Publishing medium, article type, and author demographic factors are discussed. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Citations (References), Data Analysis, Data Collection, Higher Education
Peer reviewedHackman, Judith Dozier – Research in Higher Education, 1983
Seven institutional research maxims based on research and theory about how people cognitively process information are discussed: more may not be better; augment humans with models; chunk data wisely; know decision-makers; heuristics are not always helpful; arrange tables by patterns; and accept negative evidence and new hypotheses. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Bias, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Decision Making
Peer reviewedZey-Ferrell, Mary; Ervin, Delbert – Research in Higher Education, 1985
Two explanations of congruency of ideal (intent) and actual (action/behavior) work of faculty are examined--reward expectations and referent others. Based on interviews, a survey, and institutional data, it was found that referent others' goals have a greater influence than reward expectations on the congruency of work. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Administrators, College Faculty, Congruence (Psychology)

Direct link
