NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxi Schulz; Malte Kramer; Oliver Kuss; Tim Mathes – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
In sparse data meta-analyses (with few trials or zero events), conventional methods may distort results. Although better-performing one-stage methods have become available in recent years, their implementation remains limited in practice. This study examines the impact of using conventional methods compared to one-stage models by re-analysing…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Data Analysis, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seo, Michael; Furukawa, Toshi A.; Karyotaki, Eirini; Efthimiou, Orestis – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Clinical prediction models are widely used in modern clinical practice. Such models are often developed using individual patient data (IPD) from a single study, but often there are IPD available from multiple studies. This allows using meta-analytical methods for developing prediction models, increasing power and precision. Different studies,…
Descriptors: Prediction, Models, Patients, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas; Hoaglin, David C.; Kulinskaya, Elena – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
For meta-analysis of studies that report outcomes as binomial proportions, the most popular measure of effect is the odds ratio (OR), usually analyzed as log(OR). Many meta-analyses use the risk ratio (RR) and its logarithm because of its simpler interpretation. Although log(OR) and log(RR) are both unbounded, use of log(RR) must ensure that…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Risk, Research Problems, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Efthimiou, Orestis; White, Ian R. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Standard models for network meta-analysis simultaneously estimate multiple relative treatment effects. In practice, after estimation, these multiple estimates usually pass through a formal or informal selection procedure, eg, when researchers draw conclusions about the effects of the best performing treatment in the network. In this paper, we…
Descriptors: Models, Meta Analysis, Network Analysis, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Qianying; Liao, Jing; Lapata, Mirella; Macleod, Malcolm – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
We sought to apply natural language processing to the task of automatic risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature, which could speed the process of systematic review, provide information to guide research improvement activity, and support translation from preclinical to clinical research. We use 7840 full-text publications describing…
Descriptors: Risk, Natural Language Processing, Medical Research, Networks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bom, Pedro R. D.; Rachinger, Heiko – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Publication bias distorts the available empirical evidence and misinforms policymaking. Evidence of publication bias is mounting in virtually all fields of empirical research. This paper proposes the endogenous kink (EK) meta-regression model as a novel method of publication bias correction. The EK method fits a piecewise linear meta-regression of…
Descriptors: Bias, Publications, Models, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Freeman, S. C.; Fisher, D.; Tierney, J. F.; Carpenter, J. R. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Background: Stratified medicine seeks to identify patients most likely to respond to treatment. Individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) models have greater power than individual trials to identify treatment-covariate interactions (TCIs). Treatment-covariate interactions contain "within" and "across" trial…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Patients, Outcomes of Treatment, Meta Analysis