NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Klugkist, Irene; Laudy, Olav; Hoijtink, Herbert – Psychological Methods, 2010
In this article, a Bayesian model selection approach is introduced that can select the best of a set of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables. The hypotheses are presented in terms of cell probabilities allowing researchers to test (in)equality constrained hypotheses in a format that is directly related to the data.…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Models, Selection, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kuiper, Rebecca M.; Hoijtink, Herbert – Psychological Methods, 2010
This article discusses comparisons of means using exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Three methods are discussed: hypothesis testing, model selection based on information criteria, and Bayesian model selection. Throughout the article, an example is used to illustrate and evaluate the two approaches and the three methods. We demonstrate that…
Descriptors: Models, Testing, Hypothesis Testing, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Iverson, Geoffrey J.; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan; Lee, Michael D. – Psychological Methods, 2010
The purpose of the recently proposed "p[subscript rep]" statistic is to estimate the probability of concurrence, that is, the probability that a replicate experiment yields an effect of the same sign (Killeen, 2005a). The influential journal "Psychological Science" endorses "p[subscript rep]" and recommends its use…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Evaluation Methods, Probability, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Blouin, David C.; Riopelle, Arthur J. – Psychological Methods, 2005
Confidence intervals (CIs) for means are frequently advocated as alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), for which a common theme in the debate is that conclusions from CIs and NHST should be mutually consistent. The authors examined a class of CIs for which the conclusions are said to be inconsistent with NHST in…
Descriptors: Intervals, Hypothesis Testing, Generalization, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
MacCallum, Robert C.; Browne, Michael W.; Cai, Li – Psychological Methods, 2006
For comparing nested covariance structure models, the standard procedure is the likelihood ratio test of the difference in fit, where the null hypothesis is that the models fit identically in the population. A procedure for determining statistical power of this test is presented where effect size is based on a specified difference in overall fit…
Descriptors: Testing, Models, Statistical Analysis, Research Methodology