Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Models | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Natural Language Processing | 1 |
| Readability | 1 |
| Readability Formulas | 1 |
| Reading Instruction | 1 |
| Reading Processes | 1 |
| Reading Rate | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Research in Reading | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkCrossley, Scott A.; Skalicky, Stephen; Dascalu, Mihai – Journal of Research in Reading, 2019
Background: Advances in natural language processing (NLP) and computational linguistics have facilitated major improvements on traditional readability formulas that aim at predicting the overall difficulty of a text. Recent studies have identified several types of linguistic features that are theoretically motivated and predictive of human…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Readability, Reading Comprehension, Reading Rate
Peer reviewedReilly, Ronan G. – Journal of Research in Reading, 1985
Highlights ways in which standard information processing models of language, and specifically of reading, are deficient. Deficiencies are considered under four headings: (1) theoretical rigour, (2) the interaction of different levels of information during reading; (3) the parallel nature of much of human information processing, and (4) reading…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Language Processing, Models, Reading Comprehension
