Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Conformity | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Democratic Values | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grantsmanship | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Political Influences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Higher Education | 1 |
Author
| Van de Kaa, Dirk J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedVan de Kaa, Dirk J. – Higher Education, 1994
It is suggested that, in the Netherlands' system of resource allocation for research, there is subtle and powerful pressure for consensus. Changes in science policy orientation since the 1960s are traced, and the current framework for policy formation, planning, and decision making is sketched. Three peer review models are examined. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Conformity, Decision Making, Democratic Values
