Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cues | 2 |
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Pictorial Stimuli | 2 |
| Syntax | 2 |
| Task Analysis | 2 |
| Ambiguity (Semantics) | 1 |
| Associative Learning | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Developmental Psychology | 2 |
Author
| Gamez, Perla B. | 1 |
| Huttenlocher, Janellen | 1 |
| Marcus, Gary F. | 1 |
| Pylkkanen, Liina | 1 |
| Rabagliati, Hugh | 1 |
| Shimpi, Priya M. | 1 |
| Vasilyeva, Marina | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rabagliati, Hugh; Pylkkanen, Liina; Marcus, Gary F. – Developmental Psychology, 2013
Language is rife with ambiguity. Do children and adults meet this challenge in similar ways? Recent work suggests that while adults resolve syntactic ambiguities by integrating a variety of cues, children are less sensitive to top-down evidence. We test whether this top-down insensitivity is specific to syntax or a general feature of children's…
Descriptors: Ambiguity (Semantics), Syntax, Psycholinguistics, Infants
Shimpi, Priya M.; Gamez, Perla B.; Huttenlocher, Janellen; Vasilyeva, Marina – Developmental Psychology, 2007
The current studies used a syntactic priming paradigm with 3- and 4-year-old children. In Experiment 1, children were asked to describe a series of drawings depicting transitive and dative relations to establish baseline production levels. In Experiment 2, an experimenter described a similar series of drawings using one of two syntactic forms…
Descriptors: Sentences, Syntax, Young Children, Pictorial Stimuli

Peer reviewed
Direct link
