Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Models | 3 |
| Prior Learning | 3 |
| Reader Text Relationship | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Cognitive Development | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Content Area Reading | 1 |
| Critical Reading | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition and Instruction | 3 |
Author
| Graesser, Arthur C. | 1 |
| Maier, Johanna | 1 |
| Otero, Jose | 1 |
| Richter, Tobias | 1 |
| Silfies, Laurie Ney | 1 |
| Voss, James F. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Maier, Johanna; Richter, Tobias – Cognition and Instruction, 2013
When reading multiple texts about controversial scientific issues, learners must construct a coherent mental representation of the issue based on conflicting information that can be more or less belief-consistent. The present experiment investigated the effects of text-belief consistency on the situation model and memory for text. Students read…
Descriptors: Information Seeking, Science and Society, Information Sources, Critical Reading
Peer reviewedVoss, James F.; Silfies, Laurie Ney – Cognition and Instruction, 1996
Examined the different influences of comprehension-skill and domain-knowledge components on learning from text. Found that learning from an expanded text with explicit causal relations was related to reading comprehension skill rather than prior knowledge, whereas learning from an unexpanded text that did not spell out causes was a function of…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Models, Prior Learning, Reader Text Relationship
Peer reviewedOtero, Jose; Graesser, Arthur C. – Cognition and Instruction, 2001
Evaluated the PREG conceptual model of human question asking. Found the model was sufficient as it accounted for nearly all of the questions produced by students, and was discriminating in that it could identify the conditions in which particular classes of questions are or are not generated. (Author/SD)
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Expository Writing

Direct link
