Descriptor
| Construct Validity | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Factor Structure | 2 |
| Intelligence Tests | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Preadolescents | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcCallum, R. Steve; And Others – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1988
Administration of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (fourth edition) to 60 elementary school students (in grades four, five, and six) resulted in means consistent with their gifted status. Factor analyses, including LISREL confirmatory analysis, offered only partial support to the Binet model. (TJH)
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Construct Validity, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedGridley, Betty E.; McIntosh, David E. – Journal of School Psychology, 1991
Studied structure of Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition for normal children who were not part of standardization sample. Found that, for children aged 2-6 years, either 2- or 3-factor model could be supported. For students aged 7-11, neither of 2 models studied was supported. Alternative model with verbal reasoning, quantitative reasoning,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Construct Validity, Elementary Education
