Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
| Models | 5 |
| Advanced Placement Programs | 4 |
| Difficulty Level | 4 |
| Test Items | 4 |
| Achievement Tests | 3 |
| Test Construction | 3 |
| Educational Assessment | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Science Tests | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Advanced Placement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Kaliski, Pamela | 3 |
| Engelhard, George, Jr. | 2 |
| Huff, Kristen | 2 |
| Wind, Stefanie A. | 2 |
| Ewing, Maureen | 1 |
| France, Megan | 1 |
| Hendrickson, Amy | 1 |
| Kaliski, Pamela K. | 1 |
| Mislevy, Robert J. | 1 |
| Morgan, Deanna | 1 |
| Morgan, Deanna L. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Non-Print Media | 2 |
| Reference Materials - General | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 5 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hendrickson, Amy; Ewing, Maureen; Kaliski, Pamela; Huff, Kristen – Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 2013
Evidence-centered design (ECD) is an orientation towards assessment development. It differs from conventional practice in several ways and consists of multiple activities. Each of these activities results in a set of useful documentation: domain analysis, domain modeling, construction of the assessment framework, and assessment…
Descriptors: Evidence, Test Construction, Educational Assessment, Learning Theories
Kaliski, Pamela; Wind, Stefanie A.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Morgan, Deanna; Plake, Barbara; Reshetar, Rosemary – College Board, 2012
The Many-Facet Rasch (MFR) Model is traditionally used to evaluate the quality of ratings on constructed response assessments; however, it can also be used to evaluate the quality of judgments from panel-based standard setting procedures. The current study illustrates the use of the MFR Model by examining the quality of ratings obtained from a…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Achievement Tests, Item Response Theory, Models
Kaliski, Pamela K.; Wind, Stefanie A.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Morgan, Deanna L.; Plake, Barbara S.; Reshetar, Rosemary A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
The many-faceted Rasch (MFR) model has been used to evaluate the quality of ratings on constructed response assessments; however, it can also be used to evaluate the quality of judgments from panel-based standard setting procedures. The current study illustrates the use of the MFR model for examining the quality of ratings obtained from a standard…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Models, Standard Setting (Scoring), Science Tests
Kaliski, Pamela; France, Megan; Huff, Kristen; Thurber, Allison – College Board, 2011
Developing a cognitive model of task performance is an important and often overlooked phase in assessment design; failing to establish such a model can threaten the validity of the inferences made from the scores produced by an assessment (e.g., Leighton, 2004). Conducting think aloud interviews (TAIs), where students think aloud while completing…
Descriptors: World History, Advanced Placement Programs, Achievement Tests, Protocol Analysis
Myford, Carol M.; Mislevy, Robert J. – 1995
Establishing and refining a framework for performance assessment is especially difficult in large-scale settings that can involve hundreds of judges and thousands of students. This presentation advocates the interactive use of two complementary analytic perspectives and illustrates the approach in the context of the College Entrance Examination…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, Art Products, Educational Assessment, Educational Improvement

Peer reviewed
Direct link
