NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 22 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tibon, Roni; Vakil, Eli; Goldstein, Abraham; Levy, Daniel A. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
It has been proposed that the formation of episodic associations between stimuli may involve different processes when memoranda are from the same or different perceptual domains, and when stimuli are experienced concurrently or sequentially. Such differences are postulated to determine the degree of unitization of memoranda, and are asserted to…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Familiarity, Memory, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mickes, Laura; Seale-Carlisle, Travis M.; Wixted, John T. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2013
Although frequently used with recognition, a few studies have used the Remember/Know procedure with free recall. In each case, participants gave Know judgments to a significant number of recalled items (items that were presumably not remembered on the basis of familiarity). What do these Know judgments mean? We investigated this issue using a…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Familiarity, Recall (Psychology), Task Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ryals, Anthony J.; Cleary, Anne M. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Among cues that fail to elicit successful recall, participants can still discriminate between cues that do and do not resemble studied items. This ability is referred to as recognition without cued recall (RWCR). We hypothesized that whereas recognition with cued recall is at least partly based on recalled studied information, RWCR results from a…
Descriptors: Cues, Test Items, Familiarity, Recognition (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mulligan, Neil W.; Picklesimer, Milton – Journal of Memory and Language, 2012
Dual-process models differentiate between two bases of memory, recollection and familiarity. It is routinely claimed that deeper, semantic encoding enhances recollection relative to shallow, non-semantic encoding, and that recollection is largely a product of semantic, elaborative rehearsal. The present experiments show that this is not always the…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Semantics, Computational Linguistics, Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brown, Aaron A.; Bodner, Glen E. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2011
When participants must classify their recognition experiences as remembering or knowing, variables often have dissociative effects on the two judgments. In contrast, when participants independently rate recollection "and" familiarity only parallel effects have been reported. To investigate this discrepancy we compared the effects of masked priming…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Classification, Memory, Knowledge Level
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scimeca, Jason M.; McDonough, Ian M.; Gallo, David A. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2011
Memories have qualitative properties (e.g., the different kinds of features or details that can be retrieved) and quantitative properties (e.g., the frequency and/or strength of retrieval). Here we investigated the relative contribution of these two properties to the retrieval monitoring process. Participants studied a list of words, and memory…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Comparative Analysis, Stimuli
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Buchler, Norbou G.; Light, Leah L.; Reder, Lynne M. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
In two experiments, participants studied word pairs and later discriminated old (intact) word pairs from foils, including recombined word pairs and pairs including one or two previously unstudied words. Rather than making old/new memory judgments, they chose one of five responses: (1) Old-Old (original), (2) Old-Old (rearranged), (3) Old-New, (4)…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Experiments, Associative Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Joordens, Steve; Ozubko, Jason D.; Niewiadomski, Marty W. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
In his analysis of the pseudoword effect, [Greene, R.L. (2004). Recognition memory for pseudowords. "Journal of Memory and Language," 50, 259-267.] suggests nonwords can feel more familiar that words in a recognition context if the orthographic features of the nonword match well with the features of the items presented at study. One possible…
Descriptors: Test Items, Familiarity, Recognition (Psychology), Experimental Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallo, David A.; Meadow, Nathaniel G.; Johnson, Elizabeth L.; Foster, Katherine T. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Thinking about the meaning of studied words (deep processing) enhances memory on typical recognition tests, relative to focusing on perceptual features (shallow processing). One explanation for this levels-of-processing effect is that deep processing leads to the encoding of more distinctive representations (i.e., more unique semantic or…
Descriptors: Semantics, Memory, Familiarity, Heuristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brainerd, C. J.; Reyna, V. F. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
When recognition probes seem familiar but their presentation cannot be recollected, dual-process models predict that they will be attributed to too many presentation contexts--most dramatically, to multiple contexts that are mutually contradictory. This is the phenomenon of episodic over-distribution. In the conjoint-recognition and…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Models, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Arndt, Jason; Lee, Karen; Flora, David B. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Three experiments examined whether the representations underlying recognition memory familiarity can be episodic in nature. Recognition without identification [Cleary, A. M., & Greene, R. L. (2000). Recognition without identification. "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition," 26, 1063-1069; Peynircioglu, Z. F. (1990).…
Descriptors: Test Items, Familiarity, Identification, Recognition (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Healy, Alice F.; Shea, Kathleen M.; Kole, James A.; Cunningham, Thomas F. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Three experiments examined the effects of position distinctiveness, item familiarity, and frequency of presentation on serial position functions in a task involving reconstructing the order of a subset of 12 names in a list of 20 names. Three different serial position conditions were compared in which the subset of names occurred in Positions…
Descriptors: Memory, Familiarity, Serial Ordering, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karpicke, Jeffrey D.; McCabe, David P.; Roediger, Henry L., III – Journal of Memory and Language, 2008
Four experiments examined subjective experience during retrieval in the DRM false memory paradigm [Deese, J. (1959). "On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall." "Journal of Experimental Psychology," 58, 17-22; Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). "Creating false memories: Remembering words not…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Tests, Models, Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ngo, Catherine T.; Sargent, Jesse; Dopkins, Stephen – Journal of Memory and Language, 2007
Participants read lists of words and then made recognition judgments to pairs of words, each of which consisted of a prime word and a test word. At issue was the effect of a semantic relationship between the prime word and the test word on the recognition judgment to the test word. Under standard recognition conditions, semantic priming impeded…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Semantics, Memory, Word Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rotello, Caren M.; Macmillan, Neil A. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2006
In the remember-know paradigm, subjects report the subjective basis for their "old" response to a memory probe to be either recollection of specific details ("remembering") or familiarity ("knowing"). The response rates for these judgments are often taken as direct measures of underlying processes, but this process-pure account is implausible in…
Descriptors: Models, Familiarity, Memory, Intuition
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2