Descriptor
Source
| Educational Technology | 8 |
Author
| Twitchell, David, Ed. | 3 |
| Chason, Pat | 1 |
| Davani, Holly | 1 |
| Dempsey, John V. | 1 |
| Druyor, Dale | 1 |
| Findley, Ken | 1 |
| Hon, David | 1 |
| Riley, Thomas | 1 |
| Twitchell, David | 1 |
| Wager, Susan U. | 1 |
| Wager, Walter | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Twitchell, David; And Others – Educational Technology, 1990
Discusses Component Display Theory (CDT) as a method of instructional design, and describes a reorganization of CDT meant to increase its utility in the instructional design process. Matrices in the CDT are explained, and a synthesized matrix based on content and performance elements is provided. (six references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Instructional Design, Instructional Effectiveness, Matrices
Hon, David – Educational Technology, 1992
Presents a matrix of skills necessary for multimedia development. Skills are identified in business, artistic, and technical areas. These skills are then applied to the following reasons for multimedia use: to condense time and material; to effect rapid skills transfer; and to manage feedback and evaluation. (MES)
Descriptors: Material Development, Matrices, Models, Multimedia Instruction
Wager, Walter – Educational Technology, 1976
Develops a heuristic device called the Formative Evaluation Outcomes Matrix that systematizes the data from three commonly used formative evaluation instruments for the purpose of diagnosing faults in products of the design process. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Instructional Design, Matrices
Twitchell, David, Ed. – Educational Technology, 1990
This second installment in a series of edited transcripts based on a conference held at Utah State University in 1987 reviews the main points of Merrill's Learning Theory. The performance content matrix is explained, primary presentation forms are described, and the concepts of student responsibility and learner control are discussed. (Three…
Descriptors: Instructional Design, Learner Controlled Instruction, Learning Strategies, Learning Theories
Twitchell, David, Ed. – Educational Technology, 1990
This fourth in a series of edited transcripts based on a conference at Utah State University compares Gagne's Conditions of Learning with Merrill's Component Display/Design Theory, and suggests a merging of the two. Topics discussed include content structures, learning hierarchies, learning theories, learner control, problem solving, cognitive…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Instructional Design, Learner Controlled Instruction
Riley, Thomas; Davani, Holly; Chason, Pat; Findley, Ken; Druyor, Dale – Educational Technology, 2003
Discusses level 3 evaluation from Donald Kirkpatrick's Four Level Evaluation Model (level: 1-reaction; 2-learning; 3-behavior; 4-results) to measure training program performance. Highlights include an evaluation planning matrix; increasing evaluation data accuracy and reliability; data collection method selection; designing data collection…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Interviews, Matrices
Twitchell, David, Ed. – Educational Technology, 1990
This third in a series of edited transcripts based on a conference at Utah State University describes Merrill's Component Design Theory (CDT) and compares it to his earlier Component Display Theory. Topics discussed include concept structures, knowledge acquisition, components of an instructional design system, and a new CDT matrix. (10…
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Comparative Analysis, Course Organization, Instructional Design
Dempsey, John V.; Wager, Susan U. – Educational Technology, 1988
Discusses and defines immediate and delayed feedback as they apply to computer-assisted instruction and testing. A research classification matrix is presented to provide a framework for classifying existing feedback studies and to guide future research, and a sample bibliography classified according to the matrix is given. (31 references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Classification, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Assisted Testing


