Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 27 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 96 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 147 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 177 |
| Teachers | 105 |
| Researchers | 31 |
| Students | 9 |
| Administrators | 8 |
| Policymakers | 6 |
Location
| Australia | 6 |
| Indonesia | 6 |
| South Africa | 6 |
| Canada | 5 |
| Malaysia | 4 |
| Sweden | 4 |
| Brazil | 3 |
| California | 3 |
| Hong Kong | 3 |
| Israel | 3 |
| Turkey | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Youth Employment and… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHall, Lucien T., Jr. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1986
Changes in the elementary school mathematics curriculum and instruction due to technological advances with calculators and computers are hypothesized. It is suggested that the secondary school curriculum will catch up in another decade. (MNS)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Educational Change, Mathematics Curriculum, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewedBeckwith, Melinda F. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1984
Experiences and suggestions from a teacher using computers in a grade five-six classroom are given. (MNS)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Elementary Education, Elementary School Mathematics, Mathematics Instruction
Edmunds, J. – Orbit, 1971
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Individualized Instruction, Mathematics Instruction, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedWilf, Herbert S. – American Mathematical Monthly, 1982
Descriptions of a program called muMATH and a computer language called muSIMP are given to show what the state of the art is in mathematical programing material for personal computers. The intent is to get college mathematics instructors thinking about what the future portends for their field. (MP)
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Computer Oriented Programs, Computers, Educational Technology
Peer reviewedKepner, James L. – Mathematics and Computer Education, 1988
Advantages and disadvantages of common ways to justify the answer to a probability problem are discussed. One explanation appears superior to the others because it is easy to understand, mathematically rigorous, generalizes to a broader class of problems, and avoids the deficiencies of the other explanations. (MNS)
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Computer Oriented Programs, Higher Education, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewedHampel, Paul J. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1985
Information on grants for computers, several recommended books, two Logo programs, and some quotations are included. (MNS)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computers, Elementary Education, Elementary School Mathematics
Peer reviewedErnest, Paul – Mathematics in School, 1987
Two transcripts of children exploring and solving problems presented by computer programs are given. The transcripts show the insight that occured. (MNS)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Computer Oriented Programs, Mathematics Instruction, Problem Solving
Peer reviewedBall, Stanley – School Science and Mathematics, 1985
The learning potential of Logo programing language is discussed. Observations of students in kindergarten and first grade interacting with a sequence of Logo activities led to the development of nine benchmarks. (MNS)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Elementary Education, Elementary School Mathematics, Geometric Concepts
Peer reviewedKimberling, Clark – Mathematics Teacher, 1984
The curved intersections of conics with planes are described. Two computer programs are given to enable students to simulate the "explosion" of ellipses into parabolas and then into hyperbolas. (MNS)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Simulation, Geometric Concepts, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewedKrulik, Stephen – Mathematics Teacher, 1971
Descriptors: Charts, Computer Oriented Programs, Instruction, Low Achievement
Hausmann, Devin – Creative Computing, 1979
The Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium's (MECC) plan for statewide support and aquisition for educational microcomputers is described, with a focus on the need, development, and implementation of the plan. (Author/MK)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computers, Curriculum Development, Mathematics Curriculum
Fletcher, T. J. – 1983
This paper is addressed to those who are concerned with the development of the school curriculum as a whole and to those who have a particular interest in mathematics. The aim is to promote discussion between these two overlapping groups, so that the growing use of computers in mathematics can be coordinated with developments in other areas of the…
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Educational Planning, Elementary Secondary Education, Mathematics Curriculum
Peer reviewedHampel, Paul J. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1984
A motivational classroom activity involving mazes, with explorations in the Logo programing language, is described. Use of the Big Trak toy to teach programing is also described. (MNS)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Software, Elementary Education, Elementary School Mathematics
Peer reviewedKimberling, Clark – Mathematics Teacher, 1986
Discusses computer solutions for factoring problems. Includes listing for (1) a program that multiplies two user-chosen factors (X-R times X-S) and allows subsequent multiplications by more linear factors and (2) a program which computes P(X)/(AX plus B), where P(X) is a user-chosen polynomial and AX plus B is a user-chosen divisor. (JN)
Descriptors: Algebra, Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Software, Mathematics Education
Peer reviewedSorkin, Sylvia – Mathematics and Computer Education, 1984
Newton's method for finding roots of equations is described. How to find complex roots using the BASIC computer language is then presented, with the computer program included. (MNS)
Descriptors: Calculus, College Mathematics, Computer Oriented Programs, Equations (Mathematics)
