Descriptor
| Mathematical Models | 7 |
| Measurement Techniques | 4 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 3 |
| Analysis of Variance | 2 |
| Scaling | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Test Interpretation | 2 |
| Test Results | 2 |
| Testing | 2 |
| Algorithms | 1 |
| Analysis of Covariance | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Testing… | 7 |
Author
| Allal, Linda | 1 |
| Bock, R. Darrell | 1 |
| Bond, Lloyd | 1 |
| Brennan, Robert L. | 1 |
| Cardinet, Jean | 1 |
| Fyans, Leslie J., Jr. | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Jarjoura, David | 1 |
| Mislevy, Robert J. | 1 |
| Ryan, Joseph P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 7 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ryan, Joseph P. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1983
One of the major theoretical and practical developments in testing is latent trait analysis and item response theory. This report provides a guide for practitioners in understanding, evaluating, and using these developments to meet their testing needs. (Author)
Descriptors: Guidelines, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques
Jarjoura, David; Brennan, Robert L. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1983
Multivariate generalizability techniques are used to bridge the gap between psychometric constraints and the tables of specifications needed in test development. Techniques are illustrated with results from the American College Testing Assessment Program. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Mathematical Models, Multivariate Analysis, Test Construction
Cardinet, Jean; Allal, Linda – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1983
A general framework for conducting generalizability analyses is presented. Generalizability theory is extended to situations in which the objects of measurement are not persons but other factors, such as instructional objectives, stages of learning, and treatments. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Estimation (Mathematics), Mathematical Formulas
Fyans, Leslie J., Jr. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1983
This chapter presents several facets of a new approach that uses generalizability theory to conduct cross-level inference in psychological and educational research. Unlike past models for cross-level research, this approach facilitates multiple-level investigations to test the external validity of results and findings. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Analysis of Variance, Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques
Hambleton, Ronald K. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1980
Latent trait models provide a new scale for reporting educational and psychological measurements. Characteristics, interpretations, and uses of these scales are considered. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques
Bond, Lloyd – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1981
While some forms of test bias (for example, bias in selection and prediction) appear amenable to definitional consensus, a definition of cultural bias will remain problematic so long as it is confused with the nature/nurture issue. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Evaluation Criteria, Experimenter Characteristics, Intelligence Differences
Bock, R. Darrell; Mislevy, Robert J. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1981
California Assessment Program's application of matrix sampling and item response curve theory to the scaling and reporting of state assessment data is described. It is designed to express educational outcomes in an efficient and interpretable form that is both immediately informative and suited to analysis over extended periods of time.…
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Educational Assessment, Factor Analysis, Item Banks


