Descriptor
Source
Author
| Lord, Frederic M. | 7 |
| Barton, Mark A. | 1 |
| Wingersky, Marilyn S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 7 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lord, Frederic M. – 1984
Given that the examinee knows the answer to item i if and only if he knows the answer to both item g and item h, a "conjunctive" item response model is found such that items g, h, and i all have the same mathematical form of response function. Since such items may occur in practice, it is desirable that item response models satisfy this…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Achievement Tests, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Formulas
PDF pending restorationLord, Frederic M. – 1982
Formulas are derived for the bias in the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) of the item parameters in the logistic item response model when examinee abilities are known. Numerical results are given for a typical verbal test for college admission. Most typically the bias of an MLE is about one-tenth of its standard error. It is very seldom more…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Formulas, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Lord, Frederic M. – 1981
This paper is primarily concerned with determining the statistical bias in the maximum likelihood estimate of the examinee ability parameter in item response theory, and of certain functions of such parameters. Given known item parameters, unbiased estimators are derived for (1) an examinee's ability parameter and proportion-correct true score;…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Formulas, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Lord, Frederic M. – 1981
A formula is derived for the asymptotic standard error of a true-score equating by item response theory (IRT). The equating method is applicable when the two tests to be equated are administered to different groups along with an "anchor test." Numerical standard errors are shown for an actual equating 1) comparing the standard errors of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Latent Trait Theory
Barton, Mark A.; Lord, Frederic M. – 1981
An upper-asymptote parameter was added to the three-parameter logistic item response model. This four-parameter model was compared to the three-parameter model on four data sets. The fourth parameter increased the likelihood in only two of the four sets. Ability estimates for the students were generally unchanged by the introduction of the fourth…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Formulas
Lord, Frederic M. – 1981
Transformations or equating of raw test scores on two or more forms of the same test are made interchangeable by empirical procedures deriving the standard error of an equipercentile equating for four different situations. Some numerical results are checked by Monte Carlo methods. Numerical standard errors are computed for two sets of real data.…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Equated Scores, Error of Measurement, Mathematical Formulas
Wingersky, Marilyn S.; Lord, Frederic M. – 1983
The sampling errors of maximum likelihood estimates of item-response theory parameters are studied in the case where both people and item parameters are estimated simultaneously. A check on the validity of the standard error formulas is carried out. The effect of varying sample size, test length, and the shape of the ability distribution is…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Item Banks, Latent Trait Theory


