Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 3 |
| Michigan (Detroit) | 2 |
| New York (New York) | 2 |
| North Carolina | 2 |
| Australia | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Colorado (Denver) | 1 |
| Japan | 1 |
| Mississippi | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| North Dakota | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Michigan Test of English… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedLeslie, David W. – Journal of Law and Education, 1974
Points out an emerging confluence of apparently unrelated forces that eventually may join in a serious threat to the practice of selective admissions. Focuses on several paragraphs in the recent Newman Report on graduate education; the ruling in DeFunis vs Odegaard, a case decided by the Washington State Supreme Court; and certain provisions of…
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, College Admission, Court Litigation, Equal Protection
Weaver, Warren – Compact, 1974
Discusses the effects of the recent United States Supreme Court case dealing with special criteria for admitting minority applicants to schools. (JF)
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Affirmative Action, College Admission, Court Litigation
De Mott, John – 1980
The legal problems faced by publishers of alternative newspapers are often compounded by the limited availability of the funds they have either for legal defense or for initiating lawsuits. Although both the courts and journalism's professional associations theoretically support the position that the alternative press possesses rights identical to…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Equal Protection, Financial Problems, Freedom of Speech
Witmer, David R. – 1968
This document addresses the question of students being put into a position of double jeopardy--if they commit a civil offense, they are subject not only to trial by the public courts but are also subject to punishment by their educational institution. As a general rule, colleges and universities should not prosecute students for acts subject to…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Students, Due Process, Equal Protection
Peer reviewedBrooks, W. Neil; Doob, Anthony N. – Journal of Social Issues, 1975
Suggests that whatever role the jury has in theory, in practice it can ignore the strict application of the law and respond to the unique aspects of each case that comes before it, a right that is supported as an effective means of protecting individuals from the oppressive or unjust use of governmental power. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Antisocial Behavior, Court Litigation, Court Role, Decision Making
Buek, Alexandra P.; Orleans, Jeffrey H. – Connecticut Law Review, 1973
This article provides a section-by-section analysis of Title IX and suggests a legal framework in which to evaluate separate or different treatment of the sexes in the activities to which it applies. (Author)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Education, Educational Legislation, Equal Protection
Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA. Center for Law and Education. – 1972
This packet is designed to assist legal services offices in challenging fees assessed for textbooks, student activities, materials, or similar items. The material includes (1) draft paragraphs for a complaint in a Federal or State court; (2) excerpts from a brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court in support of a petition for writ of certiorari…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Equal Protection, Fees, Guidelines
Peer reviewedElliot, Robert Mauldin – Wake Forest Law Review, 1976
To explore the general issue of reverse discrimination, this comment focuses primarily on preferential hiring practices that have been contested in the courts. (LBH)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Equal Education
Peer reviewedGinsburg, Ruth Bader – University of Cincinnati Law Review, 1975
In discussing the constitutional aspects of the sex-role debate in the U.S. the author traces the tradition, compares the present criterion of equal protection to the equal rights argument, and analyzes the equality principle with reference to affirmative action and to childbearing and childrearing, supporting the proposed equal rights amendment.…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Equal Protection
Peer reviewedPaulsen, Monrad G.; And Others – Virginia Law Review, 1974
Presents a symposium on the case of reverse racial discrimination debated in Defunis v. Odegaard. Articles include: Racial Preference and Higher Education: The Larger Context; Affirmative Action and Equal Protection; and Constitutional Limitations on Admissions Procedures and Standards. (PG)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Admission (School), Admission Criteria, Affirmative Action
Peer reviewedAbrams, Paul G.; Hoffman, Peter M. – Yale Law Journal, 1974
Reexamines the common law precedent on student expulsions and suspensions and seeks to formulate a comprehensive doctrinal basis for common law judicial intervention that will realistically protect the rights of public and private university students alike. (Author)
Descriptors: Due Process, Equal Protection, Higher Education, Laws
Peer reviewedSpector, Malcolm – Society, 1977
The movement to decriminalize homosexuality is well launched and will no doubt continue. However, legal reform cannot itself bring about a complete redefinition of homosexuality. Gay activist groups are searching for other institutions that repress or inhibit homosexuals' liberation. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Change Agents, Civil Rights, Equal Protection
Peer reviewedDuke Law Journal, 1973
Discusses the suit of an unsuccessful white applicant to a state university who discovers that black candidates with lower test scores and grades are being accepted for the entering class for which he has been rejected. His suit against the university alleges a denial of equal protection, contending he was denied admission because of his race.…
Descriptors: Admission (School), Admission Criteria, Court Litigation, Equal Protection
Feld, Lipman G. – Journal of Missouri Bar, 1973
Descriptors: Equal Protection, Females, Feminism, Higher Education
Peer reviewedHansen, Joy E. – University of Colorado Law Review, 1979
The DiLeo v Board of Regents of the University of Colorado decision which dismissed an equal protection challenge to a preferential admission program of the University of Colorado School of Law is discussed. Whether the decision is in accord with the general law of standing and alternative remedies is examined. (MLW)
Descriptors: Admission (School), Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Equal Protection


