Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| Metacognition | 1 |
| Professional Autonomy | 1 |
| Safety | 1 |
| Student Attitudes | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Advances in Health Sciences… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSchut, Suzanne; van Tartwijk, Jan; Driessen, Erik; van der Vleuten, Cees; Heeneman, Sylvia – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2020
Low-stakes assessments are theorised to stimulate and support self-regulated learning. They are feedback-, not decision-oriented, and should hold little consequences to a learner based on their performance. The use of low-stakes assessment as a learning opportunity requires an environment in which continuous improvement is encouraged. This may be…
Descriptors: Teacher Student Relationship, Metacognition, Feedback (Response), Student Attitudes
