Descriptor
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Linguistic Theory | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Sequential Learning | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Child Language | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| Language Acquisition | 1 |
| Memorization | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Phonology | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Studies in Second Language… | 2 |
Author
| Ioup, Georgette | 1 |
| Major, Roy C. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMajor, Roy C. – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1996
Responds to Ellis (1996), who claims that much of first- and second-language acquisition is sequence learning and can be explained in terms of connectionist theory. This article does not disagree with the substance of Ellis's article but rather the extent to which his model can be applied to many aspects of natural languages. (six references) (CK)
Descriptors: Language Acquisition, Learning Processes, Linguistic Theory, Models
Peer reviewedIoup, Georgette – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1996
Disagrees with Ellis's claim (1996) that learning the grammatical word class of a particular word, and learning grammatical structures more generally, involves in "large part" the automatic implicit analysis of the word's sequential position. The article maintains that some grammatical acquisition, but not "vast amounts," derives from the analysis…
Descriptors: Adults, Child Language, Grammar, Learning Processes
