Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Sequential Learning | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Genetics | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Science & Education | 2 |
Author
| Castro-Faix, Moraima | 1 |
| Cavera, Veronica L. | 1 |
| Choi, Jinnie | 1 |
| Duncan, Ravit Golan | 1 |
| Sikorski, Tiffany-Rose | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sikorski, Tiffany-Rose – Science & Education, 2019
In the spirit of model revision, researchers continue to refine the notion of a learning progression. Despite many advances in learning progressions research, one key design element has eluded scholarly critique, the upper anchor. Drawing on science education research and studies of science, this essay argues for a shift from the predominant model…
Descriptors: Sequential Learning, Learning Processes, Science Education, Models
Duncan, Ravit Golan; Choi, Jinnie; Castro-Faix, Moraima; Cavera, Veronica L. – Science & Education, 2017
Learning progressions (LPs) are hypothetical models of how learning in a domain develops over time with appropriate instruction. In the domain of genetics, there are two independently developed alternative LPs. The main difference between the two progressions hinges on their assumptions regarding the accessibility of classical (Mendelian) versus…
Descriptors: Genetics, Learning Processes, Sequential Learning, Sequential Approach

Peer reviewed
Direct link
