Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 12 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 82 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 255 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 652 |
Descriptor
| Learning Disabilities | 2080 |
| Disability Identification | 888 |
| Identification | 726 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 540 |
| Student Evaluation | 373 |
| Handicap Identification | 360 |
| Special Education | 328 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 302 |
| Intervention | 289 |
| Evaluation Methods | 250 |
| Screening Tests | 237 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 200 |
| Researchers | 82 |
| Teachers | 81 |
| Policymakers | 28 |
| Parents | 23 |
| Administrators | 21 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Students | 7 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Community | 2 |
Location
| California | 34 |
| Canada | 31 |
| United States | 22 |
| Texas | 20 |
| Australia | 19 |
| Oregon | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 12 |
| Illinois | 11 |
| New York | 10 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 10 |
| Turkey | 9 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedKlatskin, Ethelyn; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Exceptional Child Research, Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedMann, Lester; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1971
The symposium discussion topic, the current role of differential psychoeducational assessment and training in the fields of learning disabilities and special education, is presented by Lester Mann and then followed by six responses and Lester Mann's rebuttal. (CB)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Diagnostic Teaching, Diagnostic Tests, Educational Methods
Koppitz, Elizabeth Munsterberg – J Learning Disabilities, 1970
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedFerinden, William E.; Jacobson, Sherman – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1970
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Identification, Kindergarten Children, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedOzawa, Joseph P.; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
The Ozawa Behavioral Rating Scale contains six items related to distractibility and nine items related to impulsivity. This validity study showed that the Scale shows statistically significant relationships with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised and the Matching Familiar Figures Test and may be appropriate for identifying…
Descriptors: Attention Deficit Disorders, Behavior Rating Scales, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewedAlgozzine, Bob; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1982
A school district made identification decisions for 51 students referred because of academic difficulties; 24 students were learning disabled. The school identification decisions, based on application of a severe discrepancy on the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery, did not correlate with decisions based on the federal definition of…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedKirk, Samuel A.; Kirk, Winifred D. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
The author traces efforts to define and redefine learning disabilities (LD). The inclusion of children in LD classes who do not meet requirements of the definition is seen as a common yet dangerous practice. (CL)
Descriptors: Definitions, Disability Identification, Educational Trends, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedHynd, George W.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Recently endorsed definitions of learning disabilities presume that the disability is due to central nervous system dysfunction. To identify those children who should receive a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation, an effective approach to neuropsychological screening is needed. Provides a rationale and conceptual framework for development…
Descriptors: Children, Elementary Secondary Education, Identification, Individual Characteristics
Peer reviewedPoplin, Mary S. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981
Problems with restricting learning disabilities to a range of mild handicaps are noted and five areas of controversy affecting severely learning disabled students are addressed: definitions, student characteristics, identification criteria, educational methods and technology, and educational services. (CL)
Descriptors: Definitions, Delivery Systems, Disability Identification, Educational Technology
Peer reviewedHarber, Jean R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980
The paper explores several issues which effect the accurate assessment of language and reading disorders and, thus, of discrepancy between expected potential and actual achievement. For related information see EC 132 758-768. (Author)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods, Language Handicaps
Peer reviewedThompson, Robert J., Jr. – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Evaluates diagnostic utility of Bannatyne's recategorized WISC-R scores in differentiating among children referred to a developmental evaluation center. Results failed to provide support for the diagnostic utility of recategorized WISC-R scores in general. Use of measure is limited in differentiating psychological and learning problems. (Author/CJ)
Descriptors: Children, Educational Diagnosis, Emotional Disturbances, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedNorman, Charles A., Jr.; Zigmond, Naomi – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
Intake placement data were collected from the files of 1,966 students labeled and served as learning disabled in Child Service Demonstration Centers (CSDC) in 22 states. There appeared to be a lack of consistency in the characteristics of students labeled learning disabled. (Author)
Descriptors: Definitions, Demonstration Programs, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedWeller, Carol – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980
The paper presents a consolidated criteria model which can be used to identify the discrepancy and severity level of learning disabled students. (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Classification, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedBrumback, Roger A. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1979
Operational criteria for childhood depression, specific learning disability, developmental hyperactivity, and Gilles de la Tourette syndrome were used to establish the correct diagnosis in 55 of 100 school age Ss. Forty-five Ss were diagnosed as having one of three classical neurological syndromes (epilepsy, sensorineural deafness, and childhood…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Emotional Disturbances, Evaluation Criteria, Exceptional Child Research
Peer reviewedColligan, Robert C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979
The validity of the Myklebust Pupil Rating Scale (PRS) in predicting learning disability was investigated in a two-year follow-up study of 55 preschool children. Correlational analysis yielded highly significant results with all correlations between the PRS scores and criterion measures. (SBH)
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Exceptional Child Research, Followup Studies, Identification


