Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 12 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 82 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 255 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 652 |
Descriptor
| Learning Disabilities | 2080 |
| Disability Identification | 888 |
| Identification | 726 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 540 |
| Student Evaluation | 373 |
| Handicap Identification | 360 |
| Special Education | 328 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 302 |
| Intervention | 289 |
| Evaluation Methods | 250 |
| Screening Tests | 237 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 200 |
| Researchers | 82 |
| Teachers | 81 |
| Policymakers | 28 |
| Parents | 23 |
| Administrators | 21 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Students | 7 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
| Community | 2 |
Location
| California | 34 |
| Canada | 31 |
| United States | 22 |
| Texas | 20 |
| Australia | 19 |
| Oregon | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 12 |
| Illinois | 11 |
| New York | 10 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 10 |
| Turkey | 9 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Kronick, Doreen – Academic Therapy, 1977
Though labeling often is correctly condemned as reductionism, sometimes naming a disability assists the affected person by explaining unusual behavior and facilitating acceptance and remediation of it. (JG)
Descriptors: Identification, Labeling (of Persons), Learning Disabilities, Parent Attitudes
Peer reviewedMcGlannan, Frances, Ed. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977
Some methods for evaluating movements are reviewed and their usefulness for neuropediatric diagnosis discussed. (SBH)
Descriptors: Electronic Equipment, Evaluation Methods, Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedAdelman, Kimberly A.; Adelman, Howard S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1987
The practice of posthumously diagnosing historical figures is discussed. Emphasis is on the unsatisfactory nature of evidence found for those diagnosed as learning-disabled or dyslexic and the possibility of other explanations for identified problems. Posthumous diagnoses of Auguste Rodin, George Patton, Thomas Edison, Woodrow Wilson, and Albert…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Clinical Diagnosis, Death, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedChandler, Harry N. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
The author describes the use of the revised Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude and the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery for students with learning disabilities. He cautions about making a diagnosis on the basis of only one test. (CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Test Use
Curriculum-Based Measurement: An Alternative to Traditional Screening, Referral, and Identification.
Peer reviewedMarston, Douglas; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1984
Students (N=147) referred for special education evaluation by curriculum-based and traditional methods were compared. Numbers referred through each method were similar. Academic achievement was almost the sole criterion in teacher referral and Ss referred through weekly achievement measurements were as likely as teacher referred Ss to demonstrate…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedOsgood, Robert L. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1984
The article reviews the origins of the intelligence testing movement in the U.S., discusses the difficulties inherent in measuring intelligence, and considers alternatives to current LD identification procedures. (CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, History, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedYsseldyke, James; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1983
In Study 1, 85 percent of 248 third-, fifth-, and twelfth- grade students identified as normal could have been classified learning disabled (LD). In Study 2, 88 percent of a low achieving fourth grade sample could have been identified as LD, with 4 percent not meeting any criteria for classification. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Classification, Criteria, Definitions, Disability Identification
Hammill, Donald D. – Academic Therapy, 1976
Criticized are existing methods of identifying learning disabled children, and suggested are three objective conditions thought to be more appropriate. (DB)
Descriptors: Definitions, Elementary Secondary Education, Identification, Incidence
Peer reviewedDavids, Anthony – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1971
A behavior rating scale for hyperkinesis is presented. (CB)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Exceptional Child Education, Hyperactivity, Identification
Swanson, Merlyn S.; Jacobson, Anita – J Learning Disabilities, 1970
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Identification, Learning Disabilities, Test Validity
Peer reviewedAmes, Louise Bates – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
The author asserts that the diagnosis learning disability is applied too often and too loosely. It is recommended that the possibility be considered that poor school adjustment may be due simply to immaturity and unreadiness rather than to some general learning disability. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Maturity (Individuals)
Peer reviewedMoney, John – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
The author reviews research on early deprivation and neglect and recounts his own experience with children whose dwarfism is attributed to abuse or neglect. The existence of specific learning disability and diminished IQ in many of these children is cited. The author suggests further attention to the problem. (CL)
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Child Neglect, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedHenry, Stephan A.; Wittman, Robert D. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The study examined the use of A. Bannatyne's Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) subtest score recategorization hierarchy in identifying elementary students with learning disabilities (LD). The results indicated that Bannatyne's pattern was of little value in differentiating between LD students and nonLD students and, if…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities
Berk, Ronald A. – Academic Therapy, 1981
The author discusses the dangers of using grade equivalency scores to identify learning disabled students. Deficiencies include that grade equivalents invite misleading interpretations, assume that the learning rate is constant throughout the school year, and exaggerate the significance of small differences in performance. Standard scores are…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Grade Equivalent Scores, Learning Disabilities, Scoring
Peer reviewedMichayluk, J. O. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
Thirty kindergarten children with teacher-identified learning difficulties were matched for age, sex, and socioeconomic status with 30 children who were not experiencing any problems learning. The matched control group exhibited superiority on all A. Bannatyne categories. However, the predicted Bannatyne pattern for the group with learning…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Kindergarten, Learning Disabilities


