Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 53 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 165 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 403 |
Descriptor
| Disability Identification | 887 |
| Learning Disabilities | 887 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 243 |
| Special Education | 182 |
| Student Evaluation | 173 |
| Evaluation Methods | 119 |
| Intervention | 119 |
| Response to Intervention | 116 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 107 |
| Foreign Countries | 99 |
| Definitions | 98 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 60 |
| Teachers | 26 |
| Researchers | 20 |
| Administrators | 10 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Policymakers | 10 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Students | 4 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| Community | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 19 |
| California | 17 |
| Texas | 10 |
| Australia | 9 |
| United States | 9 |
| Oregon | 7 |
| Texas (Houston) | 7 |
| New York | 6 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 6 |
| Israel | 5 |
| Mississippi | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedLazarus, Philip J.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1984
Used the Stroop Color-Word Test to measure selective attention in learning disabled (N=45) and nonLD (N=50) children. Results indicated that LD children have a significant weakness in the process of selective attention compared to the nonLD children. Findings suggested that the Stroop is an effective screening measure. (JAC)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary School Students, Intermediate Grades, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedWilson, Lonny R.; Cone, Thomas – Journal of School Psychology, 1984
Explains the rationale, methodology, and advantages of the regression equation approach to quantifying academic discrepancy, an aspect of learning disability. Variations of the expectancy formula and IQ-achievement difference approach produce serious errors of including too many above average children and too few below average. (JAC)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Ability, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedGreenblatt, Edward R.; And Others – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1983
The report describes a child with central auditory dysfunction, the first reported case where brain-stem dysfunction on audiologic tests were associated with specific electrophysiologic changes in the brain-stem auditory-evoked responses. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Case Studies, Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedPrunty, Odessa – Child Welfare, 1971
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Disability Identification, Educational Trends, Learning Disabilities
Westerman, S. Thomas; And Others – NJEA Review, 1982
Ways of diagnosing dyslexia are discussed along with the developmental symptoms, which include balancing and hearing deficiencies, reversal of letters or words and unusual posture. Medical treatment with antihistamines and other drugs is described. Approximately 75 percent of individuals are shown to respond favorably to therapy. (CM)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Dyslexia, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedAbrams, Jules C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The author contends that, while visual defects should not be confused with defects in visual perception, the identification and treatment of visual problems is an important element in the diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedWaber, Deborah P.; Weiler, Michael D.; Forbes, Peter W.; Bernstein, Jane H.; Bellinger, David C.; Rappaport, Leonard – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2003
Comparison of community children referred for learning disability evaluation (CR, n=17) with children not-referred in community general education (CGE, n=161), community special education (CSE, n=30), or from outpatient hospital referrals (HR). CR group performance was equivalent to that of CSE and HR groups. Results suggest conceptualizing…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Individual Characteristics
Peer reviewedDaniels, Linda E.; Wong, Kathy – B.C. Journal of Special Education, 1993
The scores of 15 children (ages 5-10) with learning disabilities on the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills and the Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration revealed that visual perception and visual motor skills are separate, though related, functions and that visual motor scores were significantly lower than visual perception scores. (JDD)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities, Perception Tests
Peer reviewedZima, Bonnie T.; Forness, Steven R.; Bussing, Regina; Benjamin, Bernadette – Behavioral Disorders, 1998
A study involving 18 emergency homeless shelters in Los Angeles screened 169 homeless children (ages 6-12) for behavior disorders, learning disabilities, or mental retardation. Results found almost one half of sheltered homeless children screened positive for at least one disability requiring special education services, with behavior disorders…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Children, Disabilities, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedWatkins, Marley W.; Kush, Joseph C.; Schaefer, Barbara A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This study compared students diagnosed with learning disabilities (n=2,053) and students without learning disabilities (n=2,200) on the Learning Disability Index (LDI). Subsamples of specific reading and math disabilities permitted further assessment. Analysis indicated the LDI resulted in a correct diagnostic decision only 55 to 64 percent of the…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education
Stepanek, Jennifer; Peixotto, Kit – Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest, 2009
Response to intervention (RTI) is a framework for providing interventions and services at increasing levels of intensity until students succeed. The framework helps teachers and schools provide instruction and interventions matched to student needs, monitor progress frequently to guide decisions about changes in instruction or goals, and apply…
Descriptors: Student Needs, Intervention, Academic Achievement, Learning Disabilities
Torgesen, Joseph K. – Florida Center for Reading Research, 2007
The use of the term "response to intervention" focuses on its potential utility for diagnosis of learning disabilities. In this context, "response to intervention" can be understood as a diagnostic approach for determining which students are entitled to special educational services. It is important to notice that the validity of the RTI diagnostic…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Reading Instruction, Response to Intervention, Disability Identification
Crockett, Jean B.; Gillespie, Diane Newkirk – ERS Spectrum, 2007
As a school leader, what do you need to know about Response to Intervention (RTI) and your role in leading instruction for struggling learners? In this article the authors offer guidance about the content of the RTI initiative based on policy, research, and practice. They provide a brief history of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act…
Descriptors: Intervention, Federal Legislation, Learning Disabilities, Principals
Geary, David C.; Hoard, Mary K.; Byrd-Craven, Jennifer; Nugent, Lara; Numtee, Chattavee – Child Development, 2007
Using strict and lenient mathematics achievement cutoff scores to define a learning disability, respective groups of children who are math disabled (MLD, n = 15) and low achieving (LA, n = 44) were identified. These groups and a group of typically achieving (TA, n = 46) children were administered a battery of mathematical cognition, working…
Descriptors: Memory, Mathematics Achievement, Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification
Dean, Vincent J.; Burns, Matthew K.; Grialou, Tina; Varro, Patrick J. – Psychology in the Schools, 2006
The purpose of this article is to examine models designed for the determination of a learning disability and compare them to specific criteria to determine whether the given diagnostic process is ecological in nature. The traditional child-centered deficit model (CCD), Relative Achievement Discrepancy model (RAD), and Responsiveness to…
Descriptors: Student Behavior, Validity, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities

Direct link
