Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 53 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 165 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 403 |
Descriptor
| Disability Identification | 887 |
| Learning Disabilities | 887 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 243 |
| Special Education | 182 |
| Student Evaluation | 173 |
| Evaluation Methods | 119 |
| Intervention | 119 |
| Response to Intervention | 116 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 107 |
| Foreign Countries | 99 |
| Definitions | 98 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 60 |
| Teachers | 26 |
| Researchers | 20 |
| Administrators | 10 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Policymakers | 10 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Students | 4 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
| Community | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 19 |
| California | 17 |
| Texas | 10 |
| Australia | 9 |
| United States | 9 |
| Oregon | 7 |
| Texas (Houston) | 7 |
| New York | 6 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 6 |
| Israel | 5 |
| Mississippi | 5 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedLesiak, Walter J., Jr. – Psychology in the Schools, 1973
The results of this study and the implications for data usage suggest that a screening battery administered by classroom teachers and augmented by aides may constitute a procedure whereby a school psychologist could initially identify and gather relevant data about primary-grade children who manifest handicaps that may interfere with present and…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Disability Identification, Educational Research, Elementary Education
Kravitz, Martin – Special Education in Canada, 1982
A contract approach specifying long and short term objectives is part of an overall treatment approach for students whose learning and attention skills are inconsistent. Additional program efforts include allergy and food assessment, medication assessment and trial (if appropriate), and attention to the child's biochemical functioning. (CL)
Descriptors: Allergy, Attention, Disability Identification, Drug Therapy
Peer reviewedGraf, Mercedes Herrera; Hamersma, Richard J. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981
Beery contends that the Visual-motor Integration Test can be used to identify learning disability as a result of a deficit in visual-motor integration. The results of this study show that no or low correlation exists when the test is administered to three-year-old children. (Author/AL)
Descriptors: Correlation, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities, Preschool Education
Peer reviewedMeade, Linda S.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
To examine the concurrent and construct validity of the Slingerland Screening Tests (SST) for Children with Specific Language Disability in the assessment of learning disabilities, 382 children in grades 1 through 4 were given both the SST and an IQ test. The SST errors were significantly negatively correlated with IQ scores. (Author)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedWeber, Gail Yerby – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980
A comparison study involving 50 second-through-fifth graders was designed to analyze the relationships between the incidence of visual abnormalities and high and low academic achievement. Data suggested that children with deficient visual skills may experience greater problems academically. (SBH)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Learning Disabilities
Weiner, Sally – Illinois Schools Journal, 1979
The regular classroom teacher's role in the identification of learning-disabled children is important but often difficult. Identification is facilitated, however, by recognition of a pattern of symptoms rather than one single sign. (Author/GC)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Cognitive Style, Disability Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedProctor, Briley; Prevatt, Frances – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2003
This study compared level of agreement among four models used to diagnose learning disabilities (LD), including the simple discrepancy, intraindividual, intellectual ability-achievement, and underachievement models. The simple discrepancy model diagnosed significantly more college students with LD than the others. The highest agreement was between…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, College Students, Disability Identification, Higher Education
Peer reviewedArehole, Shalini; And Others – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1995
Simultaneous recordings of auditory brainstem and middle latency responses were obtained in both vertex-ipsilateral and vertex-contralateral derivations in 22 children, ages 8-12. For specific recording conditions, the latencies of middle latency responses differ significantly between children with and without learning disabilities, offering…
Descriptors: Audiology, Auditory Evaluation, Children, Disability Identification
Burns, Matthew K.; Dean, Vincent J.; Klar, Sandy – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2004
The Responsiveness to Intervention (RI) model for diagnosing learning disabilities has been proposed as an alternative to previous definitions. Given the importance of reliable and valid assessment in the instructional process, assessment must be a crucial aspect of any RI approach. Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) has been discussed in previous…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Intervention, Learning Disabilities, Instruction
LDA of Minnesota, 2008
Ms. K. has attended ABE (Adult Basic Education) classes for almost one year and has had significant difficulty in making progress in reading. She has passed some of the GED tests, but has struggled with others due to having insufficient time to complete them. She currently works as a teacher's aide in a daycare center. Her goal is to pass the GED…
Descriptors: Learning Problems, Remedial Reading, Evaluation Methods, Adult Basic Education
Peer reviewedFradd, Sandra; Hallman, Clemens L. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1983
The article contains suggestions for assessing and instructing culturally and linguistically different students with special emphasis on ways to distinguish the learning disabled from students who differ due to cultural and linguistic background and the need to focus on students' strengths and previously gained knowledge. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedJournal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 1985
Examples of information available from the Educational Testing Service Test Collection Database are presented on identification and evaluation of children with learning disabilities, preschool-grade three. Citations include title of the instrument, author's name, year, availability and grade level information, and a brief abstract. (CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities, Preschool Education
Chalfant, James C. – Learning Disabilities Focus, 1985
A task force report on promising practices in identification touches upon the problem of identification, eligibility, pre-referral activities, teacher support teams, high-risk students, team decision making, and transitioning and exiting procedures. The need to clarify regular and special education roles in this matter is emphasized. (CL)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility
Peer reviewedNolen, P. A. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Paraprofessional training in administration and scoring of educational and psychological tests for learning disability diagnosis is examined, and it is concluded that projected disadvantages outweigh advantages, indicating caution in adopting the practice. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Paraprofessional School Personnel
Peer reviewedAlgozine, Bob; Ysseldyke, James – Exceptional Children, 1983
Findings from a comparison of two samples of school age children, one sample (N=40) identified as learning disabled (LD), the other comprised of low achievers (N=51), indicated few psychometric differences. Many LD students did not meet federal definition guidelines, and many low achievers did meet the guidelines. (MC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Definitions, Disability Identification, Federal Regulation

Direct link
