NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 421 to 435 of 887 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ysseldyke, James; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1983
In Study 1, 85 percent of 248 third-, fifth-, and twelfth- grade students identified as normal could have been classified learning disabled (LD). In Study 2, 88 percent of a low achieving fourth grade sample could have been identified as LD, with 4 percent not meeting any criteria for classification. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Classification, Criteria, Definitions, Disability Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ames, Louise Bates – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
The author asserts that the diagnosis learning disability is applied too often and too loosely. It is recommended that the possibility be considered that poor school adjustment may be due simply to immaturity and unreadiness rather than to some general learning disability. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Maturity (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Money, John – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
The author reviews research on early deprivation and neglect and recounts his own experience with children whose dwarfism is attributed to abuse or neglect. The existence of specific learning disability and diminished IQ in many of these children is cited. The author suggests further attention to the problem. (CL)
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Child Neglect, Disability Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Henry, Stephan A.; Wittman, Robert D. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
The study examined the use of A. Bannatyne's Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) subtest score recategorization hierarchy in identifying elementary students with learning disabilities (LD). The results indicated that Bannatyne's pattern was of little value in differentiating between LD students and nonLD students and, if…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities
Berk, Ronald A. – Academic Therapy, 1981
The author discusses the dangers of using grade equivalency scores to identify learning disabled students. Deficiencies include that grade equivalents invite misleading interpretations, assume that the learning rate is constant throughout the school year, and exaggerate the significance of small differences in performance. Standard scores are…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Grade Equivalent Scores, Learning Disabilities, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Michayluk, J. O. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
Thirty kindergarten children with teacher-identified learning difficulties were matched for age, sex, and socioeconomic status with 30 children who were not experiencing any problems learning. The matched control group exhibited superiority on all A. Bannatyne categories. However, the predicted Bannatyne pattern for the group with learning…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Kindergarten, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Van Noord, Robert G.; Prevatt, Frances F. – Journal of School Psychology, 2002
Evaluates the effects of rater reliability of common IQ and achievement tests on subsequent learning disorder eligibility determinations, particularly with respect to difficulty level of individual subtests and expertise of the scorer. The study corroborates previous findings of strong interrater reliability on most subtests of common IQ and…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Disability Identification, Intelligence Tests, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fuchs, Douglas; Deshler, Donald D. – Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2007
During the past several years, one of the most frequently addressed topics at conferences and in professional journals is responsiveness to intervention (RTI). This is because it is viewed by many as a new way to think about both early intervention and disability identification. Despite its relative newness, a subset of RTI proponents contend…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Disability Identification, Early Intervention, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Litty, Cathy G.; Hatch, J. Amos – Early Childhood Education Journal, 2006
This article makes the case that it no longer makes sense to delay the process of identifying children with disabilities until after kindergarten. The purposes, expectations, and day-to-day realities of kindergarten have changed, and children who eventually will be identified for special education are put at a considerable disadvantage when their…
Descriptors: Special Education, Kindergarten, Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harrington, Robert G.; Gibson, Edward – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Results of surveying of 41 teachers who had experience with learning disability preassessment teams (intended to focus on regular classroom intervention prior to comprehensive evaluation) suggested that teachers were pleased with preassessment team members but did not agree that the teams' intervention recommendations were successful in correcting…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Intervention, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Itskowitz, Rivka; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1986
Verbal and nonverbal measures of higher cognitive functions were used to examine the degree of difference between the thought processes of culturally deprived and learning disabled children. Four groups of 20 subjects (ages 8-10) were studied. Results of both traditional and qualitative scoring differentiated between the two populations. (JW)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cultural Differences, Disability Identification, Disadvantaged
Yewchuk, Carolyn – Special Education in Canada, 1984
Issues in the identification of learning disabilities among gifted children are addressed, and examples are presented to illustrate the need for detecting both conditions. Principles of programing for this group, including reducing external pressures on the child and maximizing opportunities for independent activity are summarized. (CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCue, Michael – Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 1984
Examined the assessment processes (psychological and neuropsychological) used in the rehabilitation of learning disabled adults in a study of 130 vocational rehabilitation clients. Results indicated type of assessment was related to length of service but did not influence overall outcome. Only about half the clients were successfully…
Descriptors: Adults, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods, Individual Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Breen, Michael J.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1984
Grade equivalent scores and standard scores for 32 elementary learning disabled were compared and yielded significant correlations. Mean grade equivalent scores did, however, significantly differ for the two reading measures but not when standard scores were used. The two math indices yielded nonsignificant grade equivalent scores. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities
Turner, Keith; Wade, Glenna Cannon – Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 1982
The relevance of the new National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities definition of learning disabilities is discussed in relation to the infant population. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Definitions, Disability Identification, Infants, Intervention
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  28  |  29  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  ...  |  60