Descriptor
| Disability Identification | 5 |
| Language Handicaps | 5 |
| Learning Disabilities | 5 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 2 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Language Tests | 2 |
| Screening Tests | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language, Speech, and Hearing… | 2 |
| Journal of Clinical Psychology | 1 |
| Learning Disability Quarterly | 1 |
| Special Education in Canada | 1 |
Author
| Aaron, P. G. | 1 |
| Greenough, Pauline | 1 |
| Harber, Jean R. | 1 |
| Illerbrun, David | 1 |
| Prather, Elizabeth M. | 1 |
| Wiig, Elisabeth H. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWiig, Elisabeth H.; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1982
Study evaluated sensitivity of two independent rapid naming tests--Naming Pictured Objects and Producing Names on Confrontation--in differentiating 16 children (7 and 8 years old) with language and learning disabilities from 16 age peers with normal language development and academic achievement. The interrelationship between total naming time and…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Language Handicaps, Language Tests, Learning Disabilities
Illerbrun, David; Greenough, Pauline – Special Education in Canada, 1983
The Interactive Diagnostic Model, intended to facilitate disability interaction between teacher and clinician on behalf of the young language handicapped child, is described. Four levels of interaction are discussed: identification, diagnosis, management, and follow-up. (JW)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Communication Disorders, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewedHarber, Jean R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980
The paper explores several issues which effect the accurate assessment of language and reading disorders and, thus, of discrepancy between expected potential and actual achievement. For related information see EC 132 758-768. (Author)
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods, Language Handicaps
Peer reviewedPrather, Elizabeth M.; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1981
The purpose of the study was to determine whether, by item analyses, a miniscreening test could be derived from the 23-item Screening Test of Adolescent Language (STAL). The miniscreening test is recommended for large scale screening with students from the 6th through 12th grades. (Author)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Language Handicaps
Peer reviewedAaron, P. G. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1979
The Neurological Key method emphasizes a systematic deductive procedure for reaching clinical decisions about learning disabled children. The rationale for the diagnostic and remedial decisions reached at every node of the Key is explained and is supported by data from clinical and experimental studies in psychology and neurology. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Diagnostic Tests, Disability Identification, Educational Diagnosis


