Descriptor
| Early Identification | 52 |
| Learning Disabilities | 52 |
| Disability Identification | 20 |
| Early Intervention | 12 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 11 |
| Screening Tests | 11 |
| Elementary Education | 10 |
| Reading Difficulties | 10 |
| Clinical Diagnosis | 9 |
| Educational Diagnosis | 9 |
| Handicap Identification | 9 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Finland | 1 |
| Minnesota | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Developmental Indicators for… | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBarton, Jean M.; Starnes, Waveline T. – Roeper Review, 1989
Patterns of intelligence scale subtest scores and standardized achievement test scores of 80 gifted and 41 gifted learning-disabled students were compared. A distinctive cognitive pattern of intelligence test scores and patterns in group achievement test scores were identified to target students warranting more in-depth evaluation for early…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Achievement Tests, Early Identification, Educational Diagnosis
Peer reviewedRafoth, Mary Ann K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1988
The validity of using an analysis of patterns of performance on the Meeting Street School Screening test versus using the composite cutoff score for identification of learning disabilities was analyzed for 1,377 first graders. Use of subtest scatter predicted later learning disability placements less accurately than chance. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Early Identification, Grade 1, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedSatz, Paul; Fletcher, Jack M. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
Discusses various problems in preschool screening for learning disabilities. Reviews studies which show that, in spite of such problems, early identification of learning disabilities is a viable process. Examines advances in reading theory and research which point to new variables that may enhance the predictive power of early screening devices…
Descriptors: Early Identification, Handicap Identification, Learning Disabilities, Preschool Children
Peer reviewedScott, Marcia Strong; Fletcher, Kathryn L.; Martell, Blanca – Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 2000
Thirty-four (Study 1) and 37 (Study 2) pairs of three-year-old children with and without mild learning problems were presented with a battery of five or six simple cognitive tasks. Children without learning problems performed at a significantly higher level on 17 of the 18 measures. (Contains references.) (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Ability, Disability Identification, Early Identification
Peer reviewedWeltner-Brunton, Susan L.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1988
The study compared earlier identified (grades 2-4) to later identified (grades 5-8) learning-disabled students' test scores (Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children) upon identification and over time in special education. No significant between-group differences were found at identification. Over time (two…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Age Differences, Early Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedHorn, Wade F.; O'Donnel, James P. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
An unadjusted low-achievement criterion was compared with a regression-discrepancy criterion for identifying learning disabled children. The use of an unadjusted achievement raw score criterion resulted in misdiagnosing many children as learning disabled, while failing to identify many others. Different sets of predictor variables were associated…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Early Identification, Grade 1, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedVaughn, Sharon; Fuchs, Lynn S. – Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 2003
In this introductory article, a response-to-instruction approach to learning disabilities (LD) identification is discussed. An overview of the promise and potential pitfalls of such an approach is provided. Benefits include identification of students based on risk rather than deficit and early identification. Questions concern the integrity of the…
Descriptors: Academic Failure, Classification, Definitions, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedScott, Marcia Strong; Fletcher, Kathryn L. – Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 2001
Three-year-old children (n=41) with mild learning problems and 41 typical children were given a battery consisting of seven simple cognitive tasks shown to contribute toward the differentiation of children with and without mild learning problems. Picture identification, oppositional concepts, identity discrimination, and semantic…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement, Disability Identification
Rafoth, Mary Ann K. – 1984
The study hypothesized that scatter analysis of the three subtest scale scores on the Meeting Street School Screening Test (gross motor patterning, visual-perceptual-motor, and language) given at the beginning of first grade would prove to be a more accurate predictor of future placement in a learning disabilities program than the cut-off total…
Descriptors: Early Identification, Elementary Education, Followup Studies, Handicap Identification
Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Education and the Workforce. – 2002
This document presents the transcript of a hearing before the House Subcommittee on Education Reform concerning learning disabilities and early intervention strategies, specifically possible reforms of the special education referral and identification process as part of the reauthorization process of the Individuals with Disabilities Education…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Early Identification, Early Intervention, Educational Change
Peer reviewedSternberg, Robert J.; Grigorenko, Elena – Journal of School Psychology, 2002
In this article, ten reasons are identified as to why discrepancy scores (based on differences between IQ and reading achievement scores) provide an inadequate means for identifying children with reading disabilities. It is recommended instead that children be identified simply on the basis of problems in reading skills, regardless of their IQs.…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Children, Diagnostic Tests, Early Identification
Peer reviewedDean, Vincent J.; Burns, Matthew K. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2002
The use of the processing component for learning disabilities (LD) definitions is discussed by examining its theoretical basis, large-scale implementation, and researched classroom effectiveness. Results indicate the processing definition of LD does not differentiate students with LD from low achievers, is inconsistently implemented, and does not…
Descriptors: Classification, Clinical Diagnosis, Cognitive Processes, Definitions
Peer reviewedO'Malley, Kimberly J.; Francis, David J.; Foorman, Barbara R.; Fletcher, Jack M.; Swank, Paul R. – Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 2002
Poor readers who met low achievement and IQ-discrepancy definitions of reading disability (n=54) were compared with non-impaired readers (n=325) on development of eight precursor and reading-related skills. Results indicate no evidence for differences between the two groups of poor readers in the development on the eight skills, with three…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Classification, Cognitive Development, Disability Identification
Peer reviewedHolopainen, Leena; Ahonen, Timo; Lyytinen, Heikki – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001
Ninety-one Finnish preschoolers were assessed prior to receiving formal reading instruction. Verbal and nonverbal measures were used as predictors for the time of instruction required to accurately decode pseudowords. Phonological awareness differentiated precocious decoders from early decoders and ordinary decoders. Late decoders differed from…
Descriptors: Decoding (Reading), Disability Identification, Early Identification, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedSanger, Dixie D.; And Others – Education and Treatment of Children, 1987
A 90-minute inservice workshop to facilitate early identification of children "at risk" for auditory processing problems was presented to 44 preschool teachers. Results indicated that, with a relatively brief training experience, preschool teachers can be taught to identify and refer such children. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Early Identification, Handicap Identification, High Risk Persons


