Descriptor
| Auditory Perception | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Learning Disabilities | 2 |
| Perception Tests | 2 |
| Attention Control | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Dyslexia | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Language Impairments | 1 |
| Oral Language | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedGlass, Myrene R.; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1986
Thirty learning disabled elementary grade students were given the Flowers Auditory Test of Selective Attention and the Goldman Fristoe Woodcock Auditory Selective Attention Test. Weak but significant correlations between the two tests of auditory selective attention suggested that the tests do not measure exactly the same constructs. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Attention Control, Auditory Perception, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education
Direct linkHeath, Steve M.; Hogben, John H. – Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2004
Background: Claims that children with reading and oral language deficits have impaired perception of sequential sounds are usually based on psychophysical measures of auditory temporal processing (ATP) designed to characterise group performance. If we are to use these measures (e.g., the Tallal, 1980, Repetition Test) as the basis for intervention…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Oral Language, Dyslexia, Construct Validity
