Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Language Usage | 2 |
| Linguistic Input | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Writing Instruction | 2 |
| Writing Skills | 2 |
| Academic Language | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Advanced Courses | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Mark Cisneros | 1 |
| Yang, Luxin | 1 |
| Zhang, Ling | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| China (Beijing) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMark Cisneros – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Studies in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) indicate that the use of discourse markers (DMs) in the academic writing of second language learners improves the overall quality of these texts by contributing to their cohesion and comprehensibility (Saif Modhish 2012; Jalilifar 2008; Intaraprawat & Steffensen 1995). However, despite the…
Descriptors: Heritage Education, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Native Language Instruction
Peer reviewedYang, Luxin; Zhang, Ling – Language Teaching Research, 2010
This study examined the effectiveness of reformulation and model text in a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-revising) in an EFL writing class in a Beijing university. The study documented 10 university students' writing performance from the composing (Stage 1) and comparing (Stage 2, where students compare their own text to a…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Linguistic Input, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
