NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
National Defense Education…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 82 results Save | Export
Pak, Tae-yong – 1971
This paper shows that the proposition, our universal thought process, underlies its linguistic realization, the sentence of a specific language, and provides the theoretical basis for interlingual translation as well as intralingual paraphrase. (An example of componential analysis is shown for some Korean sibling terms.) (Author/AMM)
Descriptors: Componential Analysis, Deep Structure, Korean, Language Universals
Garnes, Sara – Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 1973
Research supported by the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Ohio State University. (DD)
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Charts, Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grosu, Alexander – Language, 1973
The right roof constraint'' is the assumption that rightward-movement rules are always upward-bounded; see J.R. Ross' dissertation, Constraints on Variables in Syntax'' (MIT, 1967). (RS)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Deep Structure, Diagrams, Language Universals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1973
The necessity is asserted for constructing a theory of contrastive analysis which would incorporate both translation equivalence and "form and placement of the rules in grammar" as criteria for making decisions concerning comparability. (Available from: See FL 508 214). (Author/RM)
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Deep Structure, Generative Grammar, Language Universals
Ransom, Evelyn N. – 1977
The constraints in English on the definiteness, specificity, humaness and animacy of noun phrases (NP's) undergoing passive and dative movement are examined. Evidence presented shows that these constraints occur in other languages in marked and unmarked constructions as absolute constraints on acceptability or as tendencies. This suggests a…
Descriptors: Classification, Deep Structure, Grammar, Language Universals
MacLeish, Andrew – RELC Journal, A Journal of English Language Teaching in Southeast Asia, 1970
This paper attempts to demonstrate the concept and method of deriving various English "true possessives" by nominalizing sentences of the form "X has Y." First considered is the motivation for deriving genetives from underlying sentences rather than for treating only the surface form of such genitives: the use of auxiliary…
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Deep Structure, English (Second Language), Language Universals
Jacobs, Roderick A. – TESOL Quart, 1969
"Deletion is posited as a universal process in language, and "identity and "indefiniteness are suggested as universal conditions under which deletion takes place. Usefulness of exploiting language similarities in language teaching is stressed. This paper was presented at the TESOL Convention, Chicago, March 1969. (FWB)
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Deep Structure, English (Second Language), Language Universals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gussmann, Edmund – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1973
It is asserted that the treatment of intonation within the framework of generative grammar has not shown whether surface syntactic structure is sufficient for formulation of phonological rules. An attempt is made to demonstrate that within English phonology reference to deep structure is necessary. (Available from: See FL 508 214). (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Intonation, Language Universals
Moravcsik, Edith A. – 1971
Four hypotheses concerning the linguistic structure of yes-no questions and their answers are considered as hypotheses relating to the abstract structure of yes-no questions and to this abstract structure in all human languages. The universal base hypotheses are the following: (1) The abstract representation of all yes-no questions includes two…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Language Universals, Linguistic Theory, Questioning Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Franco, Fabiola; Steinmetz, Donald – Hispania, 1985
Argues that the explanation of the use of "ser" and "estar" with locatives presented in the March 1984 issue of "Hispania" derives so directly from a theory of universal grammar because it is indicative of the explanatory adequacy of Case Grammar or of other, comparable theories of the deeper levels of linguistic structure. (SED)
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Deep Structure, Language Patterns, Language Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hofmann, Thomas R. – Language Sciences, 1973
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Deep Structure, Generative Grammar, Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schreiber, Peter A.; Anshen, Frank – Language Sciences, 1974
Descriptors: Arabic, Deep Structure, Diagrams, Language Universals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bracken, Harry M. – Language Sciences, 1972
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Deep Structure, Language Universals, Linguistic Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zwicky, Arnold M. – Journal of Linguistics, 1972
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, Language Universals, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arutjunova, N. D. – Linguistics, 1975
Treats the general linguistic aspect of Fillmore's theories. (RM)
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Deep Structure, Generative Grammar, Language Universals
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6