Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| Language Proficiency | 1 |
| Language Tests | 1 |
| Linguistic Input | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Online Submission | 1 |
Author
| Baldwin, Matthew | 1 |
| Schenck, Andrew | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| International English… | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
| Test of English for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textSchenck, Andrew; Baldwin, Matthew – Online Submission, 2019
When viewed through a generic, one-size-fits-all perspective, use of input enhancement does not appear effective. Through analysis of individual grammatical features and different learner proficiency levels, a significant impact may be revealed. To study the impact of input enhancement on diverse grammatical features, 16 short reading texts and…
Descriptors: Grammar, Linguistic Input, Language Proficiency, Teaching Methods
