Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Item Response Theory | 3 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Asians | 1 |
| Assessment Literacy | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Eating Disorders | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| SAGE Open | 3 |
Author
| Beyza Aksu Dünya | 1 |
| Cai, Yan | 1 |
| He, Tung-hsien | 1 |
| Liu, Kai | 1 |
| Mehmet Can Demir | 1 |
| Stefanie A. Wind | 1 |
| Tu, Dongbo | 1 |
| Zhang, Longfei | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBeyza Aksu Dünya; Stefanie A. Wind; Mehmet Can Demir – SAGE Open, 2025
The purpose of this study was to generate an item bank for assessing faculty members' assessment literacy and to examine the applicability and feasibility of a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach to monitor assessment literacy among faculty members. In developing this assessment using a sequential mixed-methods research design, our goal was…
Descriptors: Assessment Literacy, Item Banks, College Faculty, Adaptive Testing
Liu, Kai; Zhang, Longfei; Tu, Dongbo; Cai, Yan – SAGE Open, 2022
We aimed to develop an item bank of computerized adaptive testing for eating disorders (CAT-ED) in Chinese university students to increase measurement precision and improve test efficiency. A total of 1,025 Chinese undergraduate respondents answered a series of questions about eating disorders in a paper-pencil test. A total of 133 items from four…
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Eating Disorders, Computer Assisted Testing, Goodness of Fit
He, Tung-hsien – SAGE Open, 2019
This study employed a mixed-design approach and the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (MFRM) framework to investigate whether rater bias occurred between the onscreen scoring (OSS) mode and the paper-based scoring (PBS) mode. Nine human raters analytically marked scanned scripts and paper scripts using a six-category (i.e., six-criterion) rating…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Item Response Theory, Essays
