NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Anatri Desstya; Ika Candra Sayekti; Muhammad Abduh; Sukartono – Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2025
This study aimed to develop a standardised instrument for diagnosing science misconceptions in primary school children. Following a developmental research approach using the 4-D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate), 100 four-tier multiple choice items were constructed. Content validity was established through expert evaluation by six…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Science Tests, Science Instruction, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Katrin Klingbeil; Fabian Rösken; Bärbel Barzel; Florian Schacht; Kaye Stacey; Vicki Steinle; Daniel Thurm – ZDM: Mathematics Education, 2024
Assessing students' (mis)conceptions is a challenging task for teachers as well as for researchers. While individual assessment, for example through interviews, can provide deep insights into students' thinking, this is very time-consuming and therefore not feasible for whole classes or even larger settings. For those settings, automatically…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Formative Evaluation, Mathematics Tests, Misconceptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Laeli, Cos Ma'arif Hidayatul; Gunarhadi; Muzzazinah – Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 2023
The goal of this study was to determine how the 3 Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test developed in primary students' scientific understanding. This research and development includes fundamental studies, model development, and model testing. 161 fourth-graders served as research subjects. Tests, surveys, and observations are all used to collect…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Elementary School Students, Science Instruction, Misconceptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eder Hernandez; Esmeralda Campos; Pablo Barniol; Genaro Zavala – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2025
This study presents the development and validation of a novel multiple-choice test designed to assess university students' conceptual understanding of electric field, force, and flux. The test of understanding of electric field, force, and flux was constructed based on the results of previous studies using a phenomenographic approach to classify…
Descriptors: Physics, Scientific Concepts, Science Tests, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Babcock, Ben; Siegel, Zachary D. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2022
Research about repeated testing has revealed that retaking the same exam form generally does not advantage or disadvantage failing candidates in selected response-style credentialing exams. Feinberg, Raymond, and Haist (2015) found a contributing factor to this phenomenon: people answering items incorrectly on both attempts give the same incorrect…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Item Analysis, Test Items, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Poitras, Eric G.; Naismith, Laura M.; Doleck, Tenzin; Lajoie, Susanne P. – Online Learning, 2016
This study aimed to identify misconceptions in medical student knowledge by mining user interactions in the MedU online learning environment. Data from 13000 attempts at a single virtual patient case were extracted from the MedU MySQL database. A subgroup discovery method was applied to identify patterns in learner-generated annotations and…
Descriptors: Medical Students, Medical Education, Patients, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonick, Christine; Schneider, Jennifer; Boylan, Daniel – Accounting Education, 2017
The purpose of the research is to examine the effect of different response formats on student performance on introductory accounting exam questions. The study analyzes 1104 accounting students' responses to quantitative questions presented in two formats: multiple-choice and fill-in. Findings indicate that response format impacts student…
Descriptors: Introductory Courses, Accounting, Test Format, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kalas, Pamela; O'Neill, Angie; Pollock, Carol; Birol, Gulnur – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2013
We have designed, developed, and validated a 17-question Meiosis Concept Inventory (Meiosis CI) to diagnose student misconceptions on meiosis, which is a fundamental concept in genetics. We targeted large introductory biology and genetics courses and used published methodology for question development, which included the validation of questions by…
Descriptors: Scientific Concepts, Misconceptions, Genetics, Introductory Courses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Herrmann-Abell, Cari F.; DeBoer, George E. – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2011
Distractor-driven multiple-choice assessment items and Rasch modeling were used as diagnostic tools to investigate students' understanding of middle school chemistry ideas. Ninety-one items were developed according to a procedure that ensured content alignment to the targeted standards and construct validity. The items were administered to 13360…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Chemistry, Misconceptions, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shi, Jia; Wood, William B.; Martin, Jennifer M.; Guild, Nancy A.; Vicens, Quentin; Knight, Jennifer K. – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2010
We have developed and validated a tool for assessing understanding of a selection of fundamental concepts and basic knowledge in undergraduate introductory molecular and cell biology, focusing on areas in which students often have misconceptions. This multiple-choice Introductory Molecular and Cell Biology Assessment (IMCA) instrument is designed…
Descriptors: Fundamental Concepts, Student Evaluation, Cytology, Biology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ingram, Ella L.; Nelson, Craig E. – American Biology Teacher, 2006
Multiple choice questions are a common method of assessing student understanding. In this article, the authors discuss and evaluate a student-focused collaborative learning strategy for working with such questions that results in greater student learning and allows instructors to better understand student thinking and ultimately to write better…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Misconceptions, Cooperative Learning, Teaching Methods