Descriptor
| Computer Programs | 96 |
| Item Analysis | 96 |
| Test Construction | 28 |
| Statistical Analysis | 27 |
| Test Reliability | 18 |
| Testing | 17 |
| Mathematical Models | 15 |
| Scoring | 14 |
| Data Processing | 12 |
| Test Items | 12 |
| Correlation | 11 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Gorth, W. | 4 |
| Anastasio, Ernest J. | 3 |
| Porch, Ann | 3 |
| Aiken, Lewis R. | 2 |
| Cliff, Norman | 2 |
| Clopton, James R. | 2 |
| Fremer, John | 2 |
| Hofmann, Richard J. | 2 |
| Morris, John D. | 2 |
| Osburn, H. G. | 2 |
| Pine, Steven M. | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Sweden | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Minnesota Multiphasic… | 2 |
| National Longitudinal Study… | 1 |
| Slosson Intelligence Test | 1 |
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBerk, Ronald A.; Griesemer, H. Alan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
This program provides comprehensive item statistics and response analyses for tests, questionnaires, and rating scales. (RC)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis
Games, Paul A. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1970
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedHofmann, Richard J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Probability
Peer reviewedLewis, Robert A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Describes an improved version of the Menne program, ITEMA, which combines several analysis procedures with option capabilities. (RC)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Scoring
Connaughton, I. M.; Skurnik, L. S. – Brit J. Educ Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Methods
Matteson, Michael T.; Osburn, Hobart G. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1970
Descriptors: Biographies, Computer Programs, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedSchnittjer, Carl J.; Cartledge, Carolyn M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
Conducts a comparative investigation of selected item analysis programs currently available which could serve as a base for judicious program selection and use. (RC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedDunlap, William R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1978
The Q Sort method is a rank order procedure. A FORTRAN program is described which calculates a total value for any group of cases for the items in the Q Sort, and rank orders the items according to this composite value. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Q Methodology
Peer reviewedCallender, John C.; Osburn, H. G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
A FORTRAN program for maximizing and cross-validating split-half reliability coefficients is described. Externally computed arrays of item means and covariances are used as input for each of two samples. The user may select a number of subsets from the complete set of items for analysis in a single run. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedClopton, James R. – Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedBohrnstedt, George W.; Campbell, Richard T. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Data Analysis, Item Analysis, Rating Scales
Hunt, Richard A. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1970
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Psychological Evaluation, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedAiken, Lewis R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
Formulas and a FORTRAN program for computing Kendall's Tau as well as a generalized Spearman rho coefficient from ordered contingency tables are described. (Author)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Correlation, Data Analysis, Item Analysis
Porter, D. Thomas – 1977
Critical to precise quantitative research is reliability estimation. Researchers have limited tools, however, to assess the reliability of evolving instruments. Consequently, cursory assessment is typical and in-depth evaluation is rare. This paper presents a rationale for and description of PIAS, a computerized instrument analysis system. PIAS…
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Reliability, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewedLee, Young B.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Data Analysis, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests


