Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Data Interpretation | 2 |
| Evaluation Problems | 2 |
| Interviews | 2 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Electronic Mail | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kitto, Richard J.; Barnett, John – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
Despite the best of intentions, qualitative researchers can be faced, in some circumstances, with having to make meaning from thin, or less than optimal, data. Using a real study as context, the authors describe the ways that they made sense of their thin data on teachers' perceptions of a large-scale evaluation instrument. They propose a…
Descriptors: Sequential Approach, Qualitative Research, Data Interpretation, Electronic Mail
McNeil, Keith; Blanchard, Charles – 1990
Evaluators usually assume that the data they receive are valid, or at least, that the data reflect that which is being evaluated. In a recent evaluation in a large southern school district, evaluators compared their raw interview notes with interview notes edited by the teachers interviewed or project staff. The program evaluated was Project SEED,…
Descriptors: Bias, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Elementary Secondary Education

Peer reviewed
Direct link
