Descriptor
| Academic Rank (Professional) | 1 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Congruence (Psychology) | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Deans | 1 |
| Faculty Workload | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research in Higher Education | 1 |
Author
| Ervin, Delbert | 1 |
| Zey-Ferrell, Mary | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedZey-Ferrell, Mary; Ervin, Delbert – Research in Higher Education, 1985
Two explanations of congruency of ideal (intent) and actual (action/behavior) work of faculty are examined--reward expectations and referent others. Based on interviews, a survey, and institutional data, it was found that referent others' goals have a greater influence than reward expectations on the congruency of work. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Administrators, College Faculty, Congruence (Psychology)
