NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jacoby, Jacob – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Dogmatism, Hypothesis Testing, Interaction Process Analysis
PIERCE, DOUGLAS R. – 1967
SELF-REPORTS OF INTERACTION AMONG 100 GRADUATE STUDENTS IN TWO SECTIONS OF A FIVE-WEEK SUMMER SESSION COURSE IN ELEMENTARY STATISTICS WERE ANALYZED IN AN ATTEMPT TO INCREASE UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIAL ASSOCIATION AMONG HIGHLY SPECIALIZED PERSONS. SUMMARIES WERE COMPILED FOR 1203 INSTANCES OF INTERACTION--408 OF MUTUAL STUDY-HELP, 388 OF HELP GIVEN TO…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Dynamics, Hypothesis Testing, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Markus, Hazel – Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978
An unobtrusive experimental manipulation was used to test the hypothesis that the mere presence of others can influence an individual's performance. A task was employed for which there were no clear performance criteria, and which was very unlikely to engender evaluation apprehension. Concludes that the mere presence of others is a sufficient…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Messe, Lawrence A. – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Attitudes, Behavior Patterns, College Students, Conflict Resolution
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Helm, Bob; And Others – Journal of Research in Personality, 1976
Four interaction-perception perspectives of the fictitious target of a double-bind conflict were provided by four groups of subjects. The perspectives included perceptions of a daughter about herself and her father (the double-bind source), and her estimates of his perceptions of both himself and her. (Editor)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Personality Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benenson, Joyce F.; Heath, Anna – Developmental Psychology, 2006
Past research predicts that males will be more likely to withdraw in one-on-one interactions versus groups, whereas females will be more likely to withdraw in groups than in one-on-one interactions. Ninety-eight 10-year-old children engaged in a word generation task either in same-sex dyads or in groups. Boys completed significantly more words in…
Descriptors: Females, Males, Gender Differences, Group Dynamics
BRIDGES, EDWIN M.; AND OTHERS
THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THIS EXPERIMENT WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER HIERARCHICALLY DIFFERENTIATED GROUPS WERE AS PRODUCTIVE ON PROBLEM-SOLVING TASKS AS HIERARCHICALLY UNDIFFERENTIATED GROUPS. THE EXPERIMENT ALSO INVESTIGATED THE EFFECTS OF FORMALLY BASED STATUS DIFFERENCES ON GROUP EFFICIENCY AND RISK-TAKING. TWENTY GROUPS CONTAINING FOUR SUBJECTS…
Descriptors: Educational Experiments, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Norms