Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 95 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 223 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 697 |
Descriptor
| Interaction Process Analysis | 5435 |
| Interpersonal Relationship | 704 |
| Group Dynamics | 689 |
| Behavior Patterns | 524 |
| Teacher Behavior | 499 |
| Higher Education | 492 |
| Teaching Methods | 492 |
| Foreign Countries | 472 |
| Interaction | 471 |
| Parent Child Relationship | 463 |
| Research Projects | 458 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 141 |
| Practitioners | 91 |
| Teachers | 31 |
| Administrators | 9 |
| Policymakers | 7 |
| Students | 7 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 53 |
| Canada | 42 |
| Sweden | 36 |
| Japan | 25 |
| United Kingdom | 25 |
| United States | 24 |
| Israel | 21 |
| California | 20 |
| Finland | 20 |
| Netherlands | 20 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 20 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Jones, Clive – Programmed Learning Educ Technol, 1970
Descriptors: Administrator Education, College Students, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Herman, Wayne L., Jr.; Duffey, Robert V. – Research Journal (University of Maryland), 1970
Descriptors: Educational Programs, Interaction Process Analysis, Student Teacher Relationship, Teacher Behavior
Peer reviewedGraham, John R.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis, Environmental Influences, Interaction Process Analysis
Sternberg, Y. – Educ Rev, 1970
Descriptors: Classification, Communication (Thought Transfer), Comparative Analysis, Disadvantaged
Danet, Burton N. – J Consult Clin Psychol, 1969
This report is based on a PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1967. Reprints: B.N. Danet, William Alanson White Institute, 20 W. 74th St., N. Y., N. Y. 10023.
Descriptors: Audiovisual Aids, Counseling, Feedback, Group Therapy
Peer reviewedGrimshaw, Allen D. – Language in Society, 1982
Reports work on text from extended event of talking among professionals. Discusses problematic communication and implications of nonsuccess in social interaction. Believes failure in explanation or in resolving competing claims implies need for more adequate cognitive and cultural models of participants' knowledge and practices; theoretical…
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Discourse Analysis, Group Discussion, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedGottman, John M. – Journal of Communication, 1982
Assesses the types of conversational patterns--from cross-complaining to contracting--that characterize satisfied couples; suggests theoretical models that account for their success. Proposes the hypothesis that the underlying mechanism that maintains closeness in marriages is symmetry in emotional responsiveness, which relates to whether spouses…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Emotional Response, Interaction Process Analysis, Marriage
Peer reviewedGrimshaw, Allen D. – Social Forces, 1980
Proposes a distinction between: (1) social interactional rules as those governing social behavior within social structural contexts and (2) sociolinguistic roles governing the use of resources of spoken and written language within sets of social structural constraints. Also distinguishes between system-specific rules and rules which may be common…
Descriptors: Interaction Process Analysis, Social Relations, Social Stratification, Social Structure
Peer reviewedMelnick, Joseph; Rose, Gary S. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Identifying clients is of prime importance to group leaders. Two variables which have proved useful in understanding therapeutic performance are social risk taking propensity and client expectancy. The present study was concerned with the prediction of group member performance following pretreatment assessment of these two variables. (Author)
Descriptors: Expectation, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Groups
Peer reviewedSmith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Data show three patterns of response to the sensitivity training experience, an enhanced rate of change in some opposite sex relationships, more satisfaction with various types of elders, and dissatisfaction coupled with a possibly declining rate of change among same-sex work equals. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Therapy, Groups, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewedFarran, Dale C.; Ramey, Craig T. – Child Development, 1980
The social interactions of 60 mother-infant pairs were observed for 25 minutes in a seminaturalistic setting when the infants were 6 months old and again at 20 months. Forty-six of the infants were termed at high risk for later school failure due to the socioeconomic situations of their families. (Author)
Descriptors: Infants, Influences, Interaction Process Analysis, Mothers
Weinberg, Robert S.; Ragan, John – Research Quarterly, 1979
Competition interaction indicated that males exhibited more intrinsic motivation during competition than when not in competition, whereas females displayed no differences between these conditions. (JD)
Descriptors: Attribution Theory, Competition, Interaction Process Analysis, Motivation
Peer reviewedYoungs, Bettie Burres – Education, 1979
A means of reducing teacher anxiety is explored. Administrative policy geared toward a warm and friendly atmosphere that fosters group supportiveness is recommended. (JC)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Anxiety, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedGonzalez-Mena, Janet – Young Children, 1979
Presents ten principles for fostering a harmonous interaction with infants. (CM)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Guidelines, Infants, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedMurphy, Harry B.; Rowe, Wayne – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1977
University students (N=48) were individually tested for suggestibility in one of three conditions. Results indicated subjects of higher rated experimenters would demonstrate more suggestibility than subjects of lower rated experimenters. Results did not indicate that subject interaction with lower rated experimenters would elicit less…
Descriptors: College Students, Counseling Effectiveness, Empathy, Helping Relationship


